A Conversation for Editorial Feedback

EF: Gold

Post 1

Rudest Elf


Entry ID: A3327103 (Edited)

ultraviolet

spacesuits

apparatus.)

Entry

700 BC

was alloyed

Entry

pounds

The price today is approx US$1,350 per troy ounce. You might want to include (somewhere) the 'fact' that the total value of all the gold in the world is approx US$5 trillion, at today's price (which suggests that there are some 3,703,703,703.7037 troy ounces of gold in the world - a figure bound to be appreciated by our Julzes.

< earth > smiley - earth Earth

Might be clearer with a footnote (there are no footnotes at all) from the word sea?

chemicals and can

at a time

<'Golden Fleece.'> 'Golden Fleece'.

named him


smiley - reindeer


EF: Gold

Post 2

Gnomon - time to move on

I think it is normal practice to put the closing bracket before the full stop. Not sure, though. smiley - erm


EF: Gold

Post 3

Gnomon - time to move on

OK, I've changed my mind. When the whole sentence is in brackets, the closing bracket is after the full stop.

I've done all those, with the following exceptions and caveats:



I've added the current price.
I haven't added the total value of all the gold in the world. Can you suggest a suitable point?

I'm not going to include the figure 3,703,703,703.7037 because that is a mathematical error. You can't derive a figure with more than one significant digit from a figure with only one significant digit.



This is an important point, so I'm not footnoting it, but I've rephrased it slightly.

--> chemicals and can

You misunderstood the original sentence, which means it was unclear and ambiguous, so I've reworded it.

--> at a time

"At a time" suggests the time was a moment in time, "in a time" suggests a more extended period, which was the case here.

smiley - oksmiley - booksmiley - galaxy


EF: Gold

Post 4

The H2G2 Editors

Brilliant work. Thanks both. smiley - ok


EF: Gold

Post 5

Rudest Elf


I really shouldn't do this while making chicken soup.

"I'm not going to include the figure 3,703,703,703.7037 because that is a mathematical error. You can't derive a figure with more than one significant digit from a figure with only one significant digit."

I'm no mathematician and so I don't understand the significance of 'a significant digit'. I simply divided the total value given for the amount of gold in the world by the current price, as a rough guide. I have no idea if the figure is accurate, and only mentioned it for amusement's sake - forgetting to close the brackets after 'Julzes'.

"I haven't added the total value of all the gold in the world. Can you suggest a suitable point?"

I wouldn't want to interfere smiley - winkeye with one of your Entries, Gnomon. I found the figure here http://tinyurl.com/2bdqoyd and can't be certain of its accuracy.

<(see Electrum later in this entry).> Entry

smiley - reindeer




EF: Gold

Post 6

Gnomon - time to move on

I'd be suspicious of that article, because it states "one has to question whether it is realistic to think of it [gold] as having a serious role as money in the future".

As far as I can tell, gold does not have any role as money.


EF: Gold

Post 7

Rudest Elf


To be fair to the article, it doesn't say that gold has a serious role as money now.

Have you had a look at this site? http://www.gold.org/government_affairs/gold_as_a_monetary_asset/

smiley - reindeer


EF: Gold

Post 8

Gnomon - time to move on

I'm not researching gold at the moment. Unless there is anything wrong with the Entry, I'm not actively trying to change it.


EF: Gold

Post 9

Galaxy Babe - eclectic editor

This is one of my most-linked-to entries, thanks for writing it Gnomon smiley - smiley


Key: Complain about this post