h2g2 The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy: Earth Edition

Madly rushing about like a very mad person rushing about is tantramount to inapropriate detail. What I think by that is that there are only a couple of ways to make the detail things that one writes, draws, says and does are to review them or have another person review them when they get five minutes.

Asking the other party to have a look when they get five minutes tends to pre-dispose thier own thoughts in a sense. The other party will be subject to thinking that it will take about four minutes and twenty seconds to do what you have asked. In actuality, the reality is that there tends to be more in the way of errors in this than just that of the request to have another party look at your doings. When they find doings that are wrong it is firstly wrong in thier mind but not nescesarily wrong in the your own in other owrds thats the first thing that will add another five minutes or so to the `correction' time allocated by the do'er.

But if youre one of the luckier ones who can probably get things more or less right first go, then perhaps the former might not apply as the person who you may have reviewing your doings is probably aware of your superior ways, and thus the added time for correction might be null.

That leaves the option of reviewing on your own. Of course if you do take on the responsibility of reviewing your own doings it should go that you will not be letting a `different thinker' analyse the product of your thought. By reviewing things yourself you will be providing your own time to make amends at your own risk, and expense. So I would think that perhaps that is why some doings just don't get done. Nonetheless things when they do finally get done, they will have errors in somones mind whether you are spot on or not. Thats typo scrutiny.