A Conversation for Cardiac Nuclear Medicine Scan
Peer Review: A4314377 - Cardiac Nuclear Medicine Scan
Galaxy Babe - eclectic editor Started conversation Sep 1, 2005
Entry: Cardiac Nuclear Medicine Scan - A4314377
Author: Galaxy Babe - U128652
Not sure the layout will be welcome but I hope this entry is informative, it was very well researched. I've kept it as question & answer as that was exactly how my own letter was laid out.
A4314377 - Cardiac Nuclear Medicine Scan
Primeval Mudd (formerly Roymondo) Posted Sep 1, 2005
Very informative & oddly (morbidly?) engrossing.
It's not really clear if the Q&A is quoted directly from the letter & I think a footnote saying 'Magnetic Resonance Imaging' after MRI would be useful.
What a way to spend a day.
A4314377 - Cardiac Nuclear Medicine Scan
BigAl Patron Saint of Left Handers Keeper of the Glowing Pickle and Monobrows Posted Sep 1, 2005
Hi GB very interesting Entry
You don't mention which isotope is used = Technetium-99m(99mTc.
Some additional links:
Magnetic Resonance Imaging A2263493
Radioactivity A661727
X-Rays A767225
Caffeine A622414
The Elements: Names and Origins A3768861
A4314377 - Cardiac Nuclear Medicine Scan
Galaxy Babe - eclectic editor Posted Sep 1, 2005
Blimey simpost, sorry radioactiveBigAl1, (I bet you found this interesting?)
I've added your links but I'm not sure what you mean by isotope Technetium-99m(99mTc do you want me to add that to the entry?
Thanks both of you, I'm going to try out that new tag
A4314377 - Cardiac Nuclear Medicine Scan
Galaxy Babe - eclectic editor Posted Sep 1, 2005
I've just wondered whether the "Researcher's Personal Experience" blockquote should all be in italics. If so, what do I do about 'Lovely Day' which is already in italics...
A4314377 - Cardiac Nuclear Medicine Scan
Primeval Mudd (formerly Roymondo) Posted Sep 1, 2005
I think putting it all in italics would be a bit much. It's probably the most important part of the entry and putting it italics would make it seem like a bit of a bolt on.
Somebody's probably going to suggest you replace the subheaders with headers. Oh, hang on, that would be me then! I'm not sure what the problem with subheaders is but I *think* it's something to do with PDAs.
A4314377 - Cardiac Nuclear Medicine Scan
Primeval Mudd (formerly Roymondo) Posted Sep 1, 2005
Yep. I think it makes the entry look a bit odd but it's what I was told to do with my Cannaletto entry.
A4314377 - Cardiac Nuclear Medicine Scan
Primeval Mudd (formerly Roymondo) Posted Sep 1, 2005
Mind you, I hope I'm wrong!
A4314377 - Cardiac Nuclear Medicine Scan
Galaxy Babe - eclectic editor Posted Sep 1, 2005
I'm wondering if it would look better if the Q & A section was bullet-pointed instead of subheaders.
I'll give it a try...
A4314377 - Cardiac Nuclear Medicine Scan
BigAl Patron Saint of Left Handers Keeper of the Glowing Pickle and Monobrows Posted Sep 1, 2005
Ref the technetium:
'The procedure takes place over two days. On the first day you will be given a small radioactive injection'. > The procedure takes place over two days. On the first day you will be given a small injection of radioactive technetium-99 (Tc.
This is all you need to say, I think. If you just copy and paste what I said above it will just put the '99m' into suopercript for you.
A4314377 - Cardiac Nuclear Medicine Scan
Galaxy Babe - eclectic editor Posted Sep 1, 2005
Oh thank you, very much indeed.
I've added you both as "aided and abeted" this entry in Peer Review, my first use of the new tech stuff (thanks eds)
I've stuck the whole Q & A section under a header entitled "FAQ's" and used bullet points for the questions. They might need spacing?
A4314377 - Cardiac Nuclear Medicine Scan
Primeval Mudd (formerly Roymondo) Posted Sep 1, 2005
You've missed a bullet on the first question and I think the rest do need braks (dunno of it'd be s or s, I'm not that technical!) and, irritatingly, the links at the end not to be put into a sentence/paragraph . I'll just find an expalantory post from my Cana..PR thread.
A4314377 - Cardiac Nuclear Medicine Scan
U218534 Posted Sep 1, 2005
I'm trying to work out a tidier way of doing the FAQ - I'll have it done in a bit, hopefully.
The superscript code doesn't work because it should be this: (99mTc)
A4314377 - Cardiac Nuclear Medicine Scan
Primeval Mudd (formerly Roymondo) Posted Sep 1, 2005
Screatch rthat thing about the links - I think it was just the way I'd done it in my entry that casued the problem. Yours seem OK in the PDA 'skin' (but as usual I stand to be corrected).
A4314377 - Cardiac Nuclear Medicine Scan
U218534 Posted Sep 1, 2005
'Fraid so Related links now go in a tag like this:
Name of the link
Name of the link
which sits between and .
A4314377 - Cardiac Nuclear Medicine Scan
U218534 Posted Sep 1, 2005
Right, here goes...
"attend [your hospital's] department"
Should that be "radiology department" or equivalent?
The spacing in your FAQ is rather awkard. At the moment I'm seeing an answer, then the next question, then a gap; rather confusing! You're also using tags on their own - ie, not nested in an or - and I'm not sure how allowed that is.
Try this:
Question One
Answer One
Question Two
Answer Two
Do this with all of the questions, and then finish with . I tested it on a little section of your text and it seemed to work ok, see what you think.
Not sure about putting the whole 'experience' section in italics, but for reference - if you have some text which would normally be italicised, but it's in a paragraph which is already in italics, then you straighten it out, like this:
This is an italicised paragraph, with a reference to the album Definitely Maybe by Oasis.
A4314377 - Cardiac Nuclear Medicine Scan
U218534 Posted Sep 1, 2005
(Oh, and by the way - headers are preferred over subheaders when breaking down an entry, because they indicate a new section on the pda platform and make browsing easier - you can jump between headers on a PDA, but you can't jump to subheaders. So I'm told. By those lucky enough to have a PDA )
Key: Complain about this post
Peer Review: A4314377 - Cardiac Nuclear Medicine Scan
- 1: Galaxy Babe - eclectic editor (Sep 1, 2005)
- 2: Primeval Mudd (formerly Roymondo) (Sep 1, 2005)
- 3: BigAl Patron Saint of Left Handers Keeper of the Glowing Pickle and Monobrows (Sep 1, 2005)
- 4: Galaxy Babe - eclectic editor (Sep 1, 2005)
- 5: Galaxy Babe - eclectic editor (Sep 1, 2005)
- 6: Galaxy Babe - eclectic editor (Sep 1, 2005)
- 7: Primeval Mudd (formerly Roymondo) (Sep 1, 2005)
- 8: Galaxy Babe - eclectic editor (Sep 1, 2005)
- 9: Primeval Mudd (formerly Roymondo) (Sep 1, 2005)
- 10: Primeval Mudd (formerly Roymondo) (Sep 1, 2005)
- 11: Galaxy Babe - eclectic editor (Sep 1, 2005)
- 12: BigAl Patron Saint of Left Handers Keeper of the Glowing Pickle and Monobrows (Sep 1, 2005)
- 13: Galaxy Babe - eclectic editor (Sep 1, 2005)
- 14: Galaxy Babe - eclectic editor (Sep 1, 2005)
- 15: Primeval Mudd (formerly Roymondo) (Sep 1, 2005)
- 16: U218534 (Sep 1, 2005)
- 17: Primeval Mudd (formerly Roymondo) (Sep 1, 2005)
- 18: U218534 (Sep 1, 2005)
- 19: U218534 (Sep 1, 2005)
- 20: U218534 (Sep 1, 2005)
More Conversations for Cardiac Nuclear Medicine Scan
Write an Entry
"The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is a wholly remarkable book. It has been compiled and recompiled many times and under many different editorships. It contains contributions from countless numbers of travellers and researchers."