This is the Message Centre for Recumbentman

men

Post 1

Recumbentman

to a tessellate plain come two disparate hordes
to fight to the death in the name of their lords

one faction may triumph or both may be shamed
but no man shows merit and none can be blamed

pawns battle upward and never look back
knights gad about cutting through to attack

bishops adopt contradictory attitudes
rooks set up strongholds enthralling new latitudes

queens go in style with the trappings of fame
kings back their champions to capture the game

unmourned, unenlightened, we shuffle away
to face resurrection when gods stoop to play


men

Post 2

Rudest Elf

The visit would have been worthwhile for this alone. I find your style graphic and satisfying. Thank you for sharing.


men

Post 3

Recumbentman

Thank you Researcher 229466, and welcome.
I hope you discover your own hootoo identity soon.
In the meantime might I remark how curious it is: 2 x 29 - 4 - 6 - 6 = 42.


men

Post 4

Rudest Elf

Yes, but did you know.....

3+4+5+6+7+8+9 = 42 and 9+10+11+12 = 42?


men

Post 5

Recumbentman

Well no I didn't! Maybe you could help me with 208656. So far the best I have is 20 - 8 + six fives (yes, six) = 42.

Now that I think of it 20+ 8 + 6 + int.(sqr root 5) + 6 = 42 too.

But that's still messy.


men

Post 6

Rudest Elf

Looks fascinating, but I'll have to pop back later.


men

Post 7

toybox

smiley - eureka

(-2+0+8)*(6-5+6)=42

smiley - cheers


men

Post 8

Recumbentman

That is so neat, it's going in straight away!

Merci, BoƮte aux Jouets!


men

Post 9

Rudest Elf

I'm lost. Why is that so neat? Is this an esoteric pursuit?


men

Post 10

Recumbentman

My own formula for my Researcher number was "twenty minus eight plus six fives (yes, six) equals 42". It relies as I said on a sidestep (repeating 'six' without the repetition entering into the calculation). I had posted it in my Journal, but it had slopped down the page and off the end. Toy Box's superior solution has now been incorporated into my "about me" paragraph. Nothing stranger than that.


men

Post 11

Recumbentman

Sorry, slipped down the page. It's late.


men

Post 12

Rudest Elf

I don't understand why Toy Boxes effort is so cool. There must be a million ways (many more for sure) to reach 42 (I've done it myself!)


men

Post 13

toybox

I think A530560 explains it all. The point is to get 42 using only the digits appearing in your U-number and in the same order (in your case 2 2 9 4 6 6; Recumbentman had to use 2 0 8 6 5 6 and I had 2 0 8 4 6 4).

Apart from these two constraints, more or less any operation is allowed.

smiley - towel


men

Post 14

Rudest Elf

Thanks for the towel. I must be very lucky! The following was found within minutes:

(2x2)x(root 9)+(4x6)+6=42

Can't find a root....story of my life!

Can one express (2x2) as 2 squared?


men

Post 15

Rudest Elf

You might prefer:

2/2 + (9-4) + (6x6) = 42


Or...... ( ( (2/2) + (9-4) ) x 6 ) + 6 = 42


Should I look further? I am not a mathematician.


men

Post 16

Recumbentman

2^2 looks nice if you want a variant on 2x2

You're not a mathematician?? How do you come up with all the formulas then?


men

Post 17

Rudest Elf

I did go to school.


men

Post 18

Recumbentman

Woo Woo! smiley - silly I know lots of smiley - sheepsmiley - sheep who went to school.


men

Post 19

Rudest Elf

I am following you, arn't I?


men

Post 20

Recumbentman

OK inspired by your anateur status as a mathematician, I have tried again with my U nimber, and come up with

(2 plus 0) into 86 + 5 - 6 = 42

But is there any mathematical symbol for "into"?


Key: Complain about this post