A Conversation for Technical Feedback
- 1
- 2
Can't recommend entry
Kerr_Avon - hunting stray apostrophes and gutting poorly parsed sentences Started conversation Aug 19, 2003
I want to recommend A1035587 - The Proffesionals, but when I try the box says it's been recommended by whoami? Fine, except it doesn't appear on SoutRecomendations, or Comingup. I'm confused....
It looks like Six might have 'recycled' the A number, could this be the problem, as with AGB's entry a few months ago?
This is why one of my picks is late
Can't recommend entry
Jim Lynn Posted Aug 19, 2003
It *has* been recycled - it was originally the entry for A1090676.
Can't recommend entry
The H2G2 Editors Posted Aug 19, 2003
Number Six has to remove this one from PR, create a new entry with exactly the same content, re-submit it into PR with an explantion as to what happened, and then let us know when it's been in there a week and we will then accept it.
Dear KA, can you point Number Six here to this thread so he knows what to do!
Many thanks.
Can't recommend entry
Kerr_Avon - hunting stray apostrophes and gutting poorly parsed sentences Posted Aug 19, 2003
Can't recommend entry
Rho Posted Aug 19, 2003
That's very odd. I've just clicked on 'Recommend Entry' for that entry as a test, and no error message appeared.
KerrAvon - Do you want me to recommend it for you on your behalf, counting it as one of your picks?
RhoMuNuQ
Can't recommend entry
Kerr_Avon - hunting stray apostrophes and gutting poorly parsed sentences Posted Aug 19, 2003
Can't recommend entry
Kerr_Avon - hunting stray apostrophes and gutting poorly parsed sentences Posted Aug 19, 2003
Nope- box comes up fine, but after clicking ok you get the 'entry already rec'd' message.
Try it for yourself- if it goes okay, then great
Can't recommend entry
Rho Posted Aug 19, 2003
There's the same problem for me.
I assumed that the message would appear straight after clicking the 'Recommend Entry' link, as it does if you try to recommend an already-recommended entry, as opposed to after clicking the 'Recommend Entry' button.
RhoMuNuQ
Can't recommend entry
h2g2Support Posted Aug 19, 2003
This is on the Feature sugegstions list - Prevent Scouts Recommending Articles Twice - If an article has been recommended from a Review Forum, then instead of displaying a 'Recommend' button for Scouts, simply display 'Already Recommended'. This should give Scouts a visible sign that an entry has been recycled, and they should be able to warn the Researcher to use a new entry.
Can't recommend entry
J Posted Aug 19, 2003
I have a question. Would the Already Recommended display show before one week is up?
If not, after one week, when the Already Recommended button appears the interested scout would have been able to figure out it was recycled.
Can't recommend entry
Rho Posted Aug 19, 2003
I thought that that suggestion referred to the 'Recommend Entry' link being displayed on articles that were still on the <./>ScoutRecommendations</.> list, to save the Scouts some time.
However, Bug #207 on <./>Development-Bugs</.> is definitely relevant: "Don't Prevent Previously-Edited Entries From Being Recommendable by Scouts - Currently Scouts cannot pick entries from PR if they have been the source for an Edited Entry already. This should not be the case".
RhoMuNuQ
Can't recommend entry
Number Six Posted Aug 19, 2003
Hear hear! And there was me trying to be all helpful-like in not using up more space than I needed to and recycling my pages...
Sorry about the mess, everyone!
Can't recommend entry
Mina Posted Aug 20, 2003
I did see that on the bugs list, but I didn't mention it because I'm not entirely sure that it's a good idea to recycle entries in this particular way. One reason is that Researchers should be encouraged to keep the original of their Edited Entries, it's the only one they have total control over. By not being able to use the entry again in Peer Review it helps this.
Number Six - you don't need to worry, we have plenty of pages!
Can't recommend entry
Kerr_Avon - hunting stray apostrophes and gutting poorly parsed sentences Posted Aug 20, 2003
Yeah, but surely that's Researchers' choice Mina- if they don't *want* to keep copies of their originals on site (they may have them stored off-site), that's their look out.
Can't recommend entry
Jim Lynn Posted Aug 20, 2003
You certainly don't need to worry about recycling - at the current rate, we won't run out of pages for another 80,000 years or so. By which time I'm confident we'll have moved to a 64bit numbering scheme at least.
Key: Complain about this post
- 1
- 2
Can't recommend entry
- 1: Kerr_Avon - hunting stray apostrophes and gutting poorly parsed sentences (Aug 19, 2003)
- 2: Jim Lynn (Aug 19, 2003)
- 3: The H2G2 Editors (Aug 19, 2003)
- 4: Kerr_Avon - hunting stray apostrophes and gutting poorly parsed sentences (Aug 19, 2003)
- 5: Rho (Aug 19, 2003)
- 6: J (Aug 19, 2003)
- 7: Kerr_Avon - hunting stray apostrophes and gutting poorly parsed sentences (Aug 19, 2003)
- 8: Kerr_Avon - hunting stray apostrophes and gutting poorly parsed sentences (Aug 19, 2003)
- 9: J (Aug 19, 2003)
- 10: J (Aug 19, 2003)
- 11: Rho (Aug 19, 2003)
- 12: J (Aug 19, 2003)
- 13: h2g2Support (Aug 19, 2003)
- 14: J (Aug 19, 2003)
- 15: Rho (Aug 19, 2003)
- 16: Number Six (Aug 19, 2003)
- 17: Mina (Aug 20, 2003)
- 18: Kerr_Avon - hunting stray apostrophes and gutting poorly parsed sentences (Aug 20, 2003)
- 19: Jim Lynn (Aug 20, 2003)
- 20: SEF (Aug 20, 2003)
More Conversations for Technical Feedback
Write an Entry
"The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is a wholly remarkable book. It has been compiled and recompiled many times and under many different editorships. It contains contributions from countless numbers of travellers and researchers."