A Conversation for 24 Lies A Second
Go see!
TIMELORD Posted Jul 14, 2002
The intresting thing will be the Oscars Matrix 2 and 3 could be up for the same Oscars which would mean less chance of winning as the vote would be split.
Go see!
Catwoman Posted Jul 15, 2002
I can't see them being up for much except special-effects things (not that sort of film really).
I'm impressed that I was allowed a little teeny bit of french there, though.
My inofensive protest about the foreign language rules, not that I can actually speak any, but why can't the moderators just use babelfish? That's the website, obviously. They've got to owe us DNA supporters something for being allowed to use the name.
Go see!
Awix Posted Jul 15, 2002
Well, regarding the Matrix sequels (impending name-drop alert), when I met Joe Napolitano and Paul Goddard last month I heard the months you said mentioned. Though other sources have said May and November.
You wouldn't be thinking of a certain Kiwi in your comment about directors taking a year between releasing films, would you? I think, with LOTR at least, it's a money thing. This way they can release movie 1 and it'll do very good business for a good 3-4 months, then they can release it on video and do yet more business, and (I shouldn't wonder) re-release it in the cinema this autumn in the lead-up to movie 2. Thus maximising profit from movie 1 before they release movie 2. I think it was a question of timing as well - waiting to release all three films together would've meant at least another 18 months delay to get all the editing and FX done (therefore, slightly dated CGI). Not to mention the audience getting thoroughly sick of hobbits with a blockbuster appearing every six weeks... Me? I'm enjoying the antici... pation.
Regarding the foreign language thing, I don't think there are that many Mods compared to the volume of site traffic and if everyone was posting in different languages they couldn't physically check them all for dodgy content.
Go see!
Awix Posted Jul 15, 2002
You know, when name-dropping it always helps to get the name right. I mean Joe Pantoliano, obviously. D'oh!!!
Go see!
Catwoman Posted Jul 16, 2002
Yeah, what was going on with the names there? Sounded like you were talking about a certain type of stripey icecream.
Am I allowed to pretend that people who have some concept of artisitc vision may not be so obsessed with money? Pleeeease? I can't cope woth anticipation. What if I die before I see the last one? (not that that's gonna happen, my aim is to live to be 116 at least).
Go see!
Catwoman Posted Jul 17, 2002
I have specific aims, but obv it's no use being really old if you lose your marbles (or other essential parts) in middle age.
Go see!
Awix Posted Jul 17, 2002
Leaving aside the tricky question of what counts as an 'essential part' ('My brain! That's my second-favourite organ!' - Woody Allen), that's the real trick, isn't it? I think clever folk call it the longevity-senility differential or something similar.
I don't think Peter Jackson etc are solely obsessed with money... but unfortunately the people who finance their (rather expensive) films are, that's the reason they've hung onto enough money to be able to fund them in the first place. There's no place for sentiment in big business...
Go see!
Catwoman Posted Jul 18, 2002
Well, many ficticious characters do turn out to be secret fans of (insert whoever anyone said they were a fan of), so I wouldn't be surprised.
Go see!
TIMELORD Posted Jul 20, 2002
Blake's 7 never seemed to fall for the star trek trick of mentioning the present as there past so i don't think Villa would have even heard of Woody Allen.
It was my quote by the way that came from Villa this one "I want to live for ever or die trying" he did have some good line now and then.
Go see!
Catwoman Posted Jul 20, 2002
If you don't mention the now you can argue that it's a different world, in the alternate dimensions scheme of things, and so don't have to worry when things don't make too much sense, science-wise or realistic-future-timespan wise.
Go see!
Awix Posted Jul 20, 2002
I hate to say it, but I think the 'I want to live forever or die in the attempt' gag was originally one of Woody's too... it sounds like his style...
Go see!
TIMELORD Posted Jul 20, 2002
I have seen most of his films and can't remember hereing it from him but you are right it does sound like his style.
Go see!
Awix Posted Jul 21, 2002
Mmm, well, let's not forget he was a writer and stand-up comic before he was a film-maker (that said I'm flipping through my copy of Without Feathers and can't find it anywhere).
I'm pretty sure the same joke, or a variation of it, is in Terry Pratchett's first Discworld novel, but given his penchant for re-using old gags that proves nothing...
Go see!
Catwoman Posted Jul 21, 2002
You can find a variation of almost eveery joke ever made if you look at the discworld books long enough.
Go see!
TIMELORD Posted Jul 21, 2002
Yes but it is strange how Pratchett still finds a way to make them new.
Go see!
Catwoman Posted Jul 22, 2002
*wishes she could afford to buy all discworld books in existence*
Key: Complain about this post
Go see!
- 21: TIMELORD (Jul 14, 2002)
- 22: Catwoman (Jul 15, 2002)
- 23: Awix (Jul 15, 2002)
- 24: Awix (Jul 15, 2002)
- 25: Catwoman (Jul 16, 2002)
- 26: TIMELORD (Jul 16, 2002)
- 27: Post Team (Jul 16, 2002)
- 28: Catwoman (Jul 17, 2002)
- 29: Awix (Jul 17, 2002)
- 30: TIMELORD (Jul 17, 2002)
- 31: Awix (Jul 18, 2002)
- 32: Catwoman (Jul 18, 2002)
- 33: TIMELORD (Jul 20, 2002)
- 34: Catwoman (Jul 20, 2002)
- 35: Awix (Jul 20, 2002)
- 36: TIMELORD (Jul 20, 2002)
- 37: Awix (Jul 21, 2002)
- 38: Catwoman (Jul 21, 2002)
- 39: TIMELORD (Jul 21, 2002)
- 40: Catwoman (Jul 22, 2002)
More Conversations for 24 Lies A Second
Write an Entry
"The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is a wholly remarkable book. It has been compiled and recompiled many times and under many different editorships. It contains contributions from countless numbers of travellers and researchers."