h2g2 The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy: Earth Edition

I love the post and am a big fan of Johannes Kepler but was a bit disappointed that his name was spelt wrongly throughout. Is it hard to change?

hi
that is hilarious!!

good catch!!

sooo to fix it...

i dunno how to get to the review folks but...

post this question here http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/h2g2/brunel/A148907 <---click on that and make a new subject in ask h2g2

maybe someone who knows the answer will see this but...
if not you need to be in a 'channel' that a lot of folks subscribe to...

you posted this in the entry's thingie and i am not sure how many folks are subscribed to it

very cool good to have you here let me know how it goes?
thanks

It needs to go to Feedback. I will post something there shortly

Welcome to h2g2! I have left you a message which I hope will help you find your way around our site


lil xx

This isn't an Edited Guide Entry. It's someone's personal writings, not anything official. In other words, I, as a curator, can't change it: only the original author can change it. (S)he might, if (s)he's still around.

The Editors could change it: they can change anything. But they won't. They only remove or edit stuff that is breaking the <./>HouseRules</.>.

TRiG.

Fluffy: editorial changes should be made at <./>Feedback-Editorial</.>.

Incidentally, a search at <./>Search?searchtype=article&showapproved=1&searchstring=kepler+motion</.> shows that there is no edited version of this entry. Does anyone feel like putting it through PeerReview?

TRiG.

U154086 last posted February 2003, so is unlikely to change this now.

TRiG.

hmm well i could try it...
but

maybe i_amalexdean would like to do it?

hows about it i_amalexdean?!

could be a good way to get your feet wet

you have a week or so to agree

otherwise i will do it...


aaaaaaargh

daaaaang!!

this author wrote another one that looks like soooooooooooo much fun

but i definitely cannot do it... clean it up...

but it definitely deserves to be in the edited guide once finished

heh heh heh http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/h2g2/brunel/A615548

and this one too... should be submitted for review...

imho its up there with 'mostly harmless' for typical h2g2 entries the way i think they should be

oops http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/h2g2/brunel/A232651

I wouldn't mind writing an Entry on Kepler and his laws, but I wouldn't use this one as a starting point, I'd write it from scratch. I'm not going to do in the next few weeks, though, so anybody else is welcome to do it.

Thanks for your messages! I'm happy for you guys to put the article through peer review - I'm not sure I would know where to start! But I'll be looking forward to seeing it turned into an "official" article...

All the best,

Alex