Eskimo, the wrong term....
Created | Updated Jan 28, 2002
Without addressing the populations referred to by this moniker, a couple points about the word itself are of importance.
1. It isn't very nice. While these populations tend to be very tolerant of outsiders, this word is no more the proper term than Kraut would be for a German or Limey for an Englishman. Eskimo is an imposed word, and if you use it in conversation with a Yupi'k, Sugpiaq, or Inupiaq individual, they will most likely nod and smile while adding you to the stupid tourist list they have been assembling for eventual publication. If they smile and say "thanks, gusuq!", you have been rightfully insulted (gusuq is a local version of Cossack, as these Russian adventurers and traders were the first white men to contact the coastal Alaskan tribes. They were, in many cases, slavers and murderers, so it isn't a comparison to relish).
2. It isn't very accurate. The groups have their own names which they prefer to be known by. The populations near the Alaska peninsula are the Sugpiaq, those north to the region of Unalakleet are the Yupi'k, those north from Unalakleet clear across the Arctic to Greenland are various groups of the Inuit or Inupiaq peoples. These groups' languages are no more mutually intelligible than English and Italian.
3. It may get you in trouble. Despite similar appearances, people do not always appreciate confusing them with their ethnic cousins. Try calling a Kiwi, Aussie, or Scot an Englishman after a night of drinking and see what happens. In fact the indigenous inhabitants of inland Alaska and Canada are not related to the coastal peoples at all, and are much more closely kin to the Amerindian groups. They are also quite proud of this and if you wander around Fort Yukon asking to take pictures of the Eskimo Children you had best be ready for a dip in the river, regardless of the season.
Use an outdated term, and you will have to face the consequences.