Consultancy-speak
Created | Updated Jun 6, 2003
Anyone who wants to survive modern life must accept that the language we speak is not sacrosanct, and they must be able to adapt it on-the-fly (or OTF - see, I just made up a new TLA, easy-peasy), and be ready to deploy these new constructs on a JIT (that's "just in time") basis.
The examples are manifold, but I've drawn up the following paragraph of complete gibberish to convey the point:
Why "buy a paper from a newsagent", when you could just as easily "cross-charge against billable occupancy on a capped risk-reward, e-business focused basis, generating pull-through revenue separating P&L from value-add, streamlining the supply-chain of the bespoke legacy-icebergs of integration on a rolling go-live, go/no-go decisions notwithstanding, looking at the Ts and Cs, giving full consideration to the contracted schedules at the agreed rates and with change management in full-effect, propose a workaround solution, implement and test in an iterative cycle, borrowing from DSDM, SSADM, adopting PRINCE, GAYLORD, SPAM, EGGS, CHIPS and BEANZ methodologies, to forge a byword in industry-standard data-mapping principles, not foregoing the bleeding edge rollout of hub-centric, enterprise-wide solutions delivering seamless integration, incentivizing viral markets, reinventing customized architectures, leveraging real-time systems, whiteboarding 24/365 portals, empowering the clicks-and-mortar markets to incentivize cross-platform technologies. Oh, and giving 45p to the man behind the counter and in return recieving the latest lunatics' update."
I hope this conveys the true value of consultancy speak, but I'm sure we can all contribute (nearly typed "add value" there, but your probably not "incentivised" enough to care), if we think short and soft (is that the opposite to long and hard?) about it. So come on you human resources, get thinking, don't be a JUMBO (Just Up Mountain Behind Octupus - coherence optional).
BTW, incentivised is not a word, okay?