A Conversation for Constellations
- 1
- 2
Constellations
Deek Started conversation Sep 19, 2000
Here's a bit more info if you want to use it.
(Sorry but I haven't mastered 'lists' yet.)
All the best A.M.
Constellations
Deek Posted Sep 20, 2000
Whoops! that should have included http://www.h2g2.com/A423523
A.M.
Constellations
Tango Posted Oct 31, 2000
the biggest constellation is '1' and the smallest '88', hope that helps!
Constellations
Jimi X Posted Nov 1, 2000
I'd never heard of that either.
Have you considered explaining where constellations came from and how they became formally recognized?
I will work on some notes about this tonight and post you tomorrow with the url.
- X
Constellations
Jimi X Posted Nov 2, 2000
I've emailed you the text. Change it as you see fit.
Let me know if you need more - maybe I'll tackle the circumpolar constellations next. I didn't include a lot of details about the stars in the constellations, just some of the mythology surrounding them. If you want more scientific stuff, I'll get that together for you also.
Cheers!
- X
Constellations
Tango Posted Nov 6, 2000
Thanks, the info you gave me _should_ all be up there now.
As the entry says one of the constellations appears to be missing (theres only 87) if you notice which one please tell me!
Tango
Constellations
Cefpret Posted Nov 7, 2000
Corvus is missing.
Maybe you should mention that serpens is divided into two sections that don't touch each other: Serpens cauda and serpens caput.
Ophiuchus is a zodiac constallation, too.
I still don't like this 'order of size' thing. A good extension would be the angular size (eg in square degrees).
Keep up the good work!
Constellations
Jimi X Posted Nov 7, 2000
I agree that the order of size thing is a bit odd. I've never heard of it either. And I can't see what practical purpose that kind of information would have.
Constellations
Tango Posted Nov 10, 2000
Hi,
When I've got something ready to replace the size thing I'll get rid of it!
Thanks for the extra info!
Tango
Constellations
Jimi X Posted Nov 10, 2000
I was thinking about this project the other day and thought it might work best as its own University project.
That was you could break down the sky into different entries - northern circumpolar constellations, northern constellations, constellations of the zodiac, southern constellations, and southern circumpolar constellations.
It might be a lot easier to handle. You'd just need to specify what format you'd want the pages done in.
Just a thought!
And how about 'angular size' rather than the other thing?
Constellations
Tango Posted Nov 11, 2000
Thats a very good idea!
I think I might do that, I'll set up an index page for the new project and link to it from the stars index page!
Thanks,
Tango
Constellations
Galaxy Babe - eclectic editor Posted Nov 17, 2000
Was anyone out star-gazing last night?
Hoping for any early Leonids?
I was, it was freezing, but I had a spectacular view of Taurus, Orion, Gemini followed by Leo, then I had to retire before I froze to death.
Sorrowfully tonight, the moon will dim my viewing of the Leonids
Constellations
Jimi X Posted Nov 17, 2000
If you had a pair of binoculars you could have had good views of Jupiter and Saturn as both are in Taurus at the moment. Jupiter is the bright white 'star' in the V-shaped bit of Taurus and Saturn rises a bit later in the middle of the Pleadies star cluster.
Pity that the next big shower is going to have a pretty bright moon as well. But I can't wait for the X-mas Day eclipse in the US!!
Sorry for going off-topic Tango. I'll behave and try to do something on the circumpolar constellations before month's end.
Constellations
Galaxy Babe - eclectic editor Posted Nov 17, 2000
I have binoculars, and I got a great view of Jupiter last nightand the Plaeides.
My previous post should have read *almost* froze to death, hehe, sorry.
I'll be out again tonight, weather permitting, I must wrap up warmer, maybe dress in a sleeping bag
Happy Birthday,
jimi.....XXXX
Constellations
Tango Posted Nov 17, 2000
Hi,
Don't worry about going off topic! I find more interesting forums often come from completely unrelated entries!
About the constellations having a project of there own I was thinking of doing a 'constellation tree' like this:
CONSTELLATIONS
/ ¦ N. Circum. N. Zodiac (etc.)
¦ ¦ ¦
(PAGES ON EACH CONSTELLATION)
What do you think, as you say there is enough info!
I'll post the url for the constellation index page as soon as it is sorted out.
Tango
Constellations
Tango Posted Nov 17, 2000
Oh, that didn't work! Never mind, I hope you get my drift!
Tango
Key: Complain about this post
- 1
- 2
Constellations
- 1: Deek (Sep 19, 2000)
- 2: Deek (Sep 20, 2000)
- 3: Tango (Sep 21, 2000)
- 4: Cefpret (Oct 30, 2000)
- 5: Tango (Oct 31, 2000)
- 6: Jimi X (Nov 1, 2000)
- 7: Jimi X (Nov 2, 2000)
- 8: Tango (Nov 6, 2000)
- 9: Cefpret (Nov 7, 2000)
- 10: Jimi X (Nov 7, 2000)
- 11: Tango (Nov 10, 2000)
- 12: Jimi X (Nov 10, 2000)
- 13: Tango (Nov 11, 2000)
- 14: Cefpret (Nov 12, 2000)
- 15: Galaxy Babe - eclectic editor (Nov 17, 2000)
- 16: Jimi X (Nov 17, 2000)
- 17: Galaxy Babe - eclectic editor (Nov 17, 2000)
- 18: Jimi X (Nov 17, 2000)
- 19: Tango (Nov 17, 2000)
- 20: Tango (Nov 17, 2000)
More Conversations for Constellations
Write an Entry
"The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is a wholly remarkable book. It has been compiled and recompiled many times and under many different editorships. It contains contributions from countless numbers of travellers and researchers."