A Conversation for Constellation: Reticulum the Astronomical Reticle

A39536643 - Constellation: Reticulum the Astronomical Reticle

Post 21

aka Bel - A87832164

Sorry to say, but the whole paragraph is confusing as it is now.


A39536643 - Constellation: Reticulum the Astronomical Reticle

Post 22

Gnomon - time to move on

Evolution is not something you choose to believe in or not, Shagbark. Evolution is proven to be true, so if you don't believe in it, then you are an idiot. It's like not believing in Gravity.

I don't think the case for two people being abducted by aliens is as clearcut. There is no evidence whatsoever that they were abducted. So why should we include their crazy belief?


A39536643 - Constellation: Reticulum the Astronomical Reticle

Post 23

shagbark

As a matter of fact I do believe in Evolution, however the Ministeer of Education of our church (who hold a doctors degree) does not. I would hardly call him an idiot.
You speak of things that belong in Scientific articles.
I do not believe Astrology has any place in such articles, however I did not object when several of the articles in this series included it.


A39536643 - Constellation: Reticulum the Astronomical Reticle

Post 24

Gnomon - time to move on

I did object.


A39536643 - Constellation: Reticulum the Astronomical Reticle

Post 25

Gnomon - time to move on

OK, I was probably being extreme when I said that about being an idiot. I'll revise it to "if you don't believe in Evolution you are either an idiot or grossly undereducated."


A39536643 - Constellation: Reticulum the Astronomical Reticle

Post 26

shagbark

I'll agree with that. The specialization that doctoral candidates pursue in the world today leaves them masters of one subject and grossly undereducated in several others.


A39536643 - Constellation: Reticulum the Astronomical Reticle

Post 27

Galaxy Babe - eclectic editor

<>

There was no need to object to mine, I did a good job of debunking the rubbish, because it was an ideal opportunity to do so. This from Virgo:
<>
and
<>

You have an ideal opportunity here to debunk alien visitations and hypnotism if you so wish, but you've failed miserably, as it reads like you believe there is an actual conspiracy involving the scientific group of people hunting for extrasolar planets.


A39536643 - Constellation: Reticulum the Astronomical Reticle

Post 28

shagbark

This waws not an attempt to debunk anything. As I said, I am keeping an open mind on the subject. I go where the research leads me and I felt this was an essential part of any study on this constellation.


A39536643 - Constellation: Reticulum the Astronomical Reticle

Post 29

Gnomon - time to move on


A39536643 - Constellation: Reticulum the Astronomical Reticle

Post 30

Galaxy Babe - eclectic editor

Well, it's your Entry.

However, I want to know more about this alien map.

You state in your Entry:

<>

Are you sure this map exists?


A39536643 - Constellation: Reticulum the Astronomical Reticle

Post 31

shagbark

I can quote the source. maybe drop the conspiracy bit.


A39536643 - Constellation: Reticulum the Astronomical Reticle

Post 32

Galaxy Babe - eclectic editor

Who has the alien map now?


A39536643 - Constellation: Reticulum the Astronomical Reticle

Post 33

shagbark

there is a link to it in my article now. I would presume the woman has the original and copies exist at OSU, The University of Pittsburg, and other places.


A39536643 - Constellation: Reticulum the Astronomical Reticle

Post 34

shagbark

further note there are fringe elements saying these aliens are still in communication with humans. This I do not believe. See also http://www.zetatalk.com/theword/tworx148.htm"


A39536643 - Constellation: Reticulum the Astronomical Reticle

Post 35

Galaxy Babe - eclectic editor

In your stars text:
<>

In your star table you posted: HD27894 - is this the same star?


A39536643 - Constellation: Reticulum the Astronomical Reticle

Post 36

shagbark

yes, I will correct that.


A39536643 - Constellation: Reticulum the Astronomical Reticle

Post 37

Galaxy Babe - eclectic editor

A39536643

<>

Do you mean Zeti2 Reticuli?<--- also note the space between "2" and "Reticuli"


A39536643 - Constellation: Reticulum the Astronomical Reticle

Post 38

aka Bel - A87832164

How many believers are there? The couple where only the woman survives? I had never heard of Zeti2 Reticuli before. smiley - erm


A39536643 - Constellation: Reticulum the Astronomical Reticle

Post 39

shagbark

the first I heard of it was when I googled Reticuli planets.
There are numerous UFO websites where it is mentioned. Some of them are very persuasive. No telling how many people are keeping this 'secret'.


A39536643 - Constellation: Reticulum the Astronomical Reticle

Post 40

shagbark

But this raises another issue. the wikipedia article on this constellation says there are 4 star systems with planets there.
I cnanot find them.


Key: Complain about this post