A Conversation for What I don't like about Cantor’s Diagonal Argument

Cantor's Diagonalization Argument.

Post 1

john_gabriel

This argument is nonsense and anyone believing it is capable of believing anything. Visit http://mathphile.blogspot.com/ to see how the real numbers are infinitely 'countable' according to Cantor's definition.


Cantor's Diagonalization Argument.

Post 2

aging jb

Well now, let us suppose that the reals between 0 and 1 are countable, and see what that implies.

Countability implies that each real can be placed in correspondence to an integer - a list. Now take each real in turn and construct an interval including the real. Make the first interval of length 1/5, the next of length 1/25, and so on. This sequence of intervals clearly covers all the reals, if they are countable, but its total length is only 1/4. Three quarters of the interval between 0 and 1 is missing...


Key: Complain about this post

Cantor's Diagonalization Argument.

More Conversations for What I don't like about Cantor’s Diagonal Argument

Write an Entry

"The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is a wholly remarkable book. It has been compiled and recompiled many times and under many different editorships. It contains contributions from countless numbers of travellers and researchers."

Write an entry
Read more