A Conversation for Single-Line Kites: a basic glossary.
Peer Review: A3292913 - Single-Line Kites: a basic glossary.
Kiteman Started conversation Jan 7, 2005
Entry: Single-Line Kites: a basic glossary. - A3292913
Author: Kiteman - U1056601
I have submitted a number of kite-related articles for Peer Review. One is currently "Pending".
A3292913 - Single-Line Kites: a basic glossary.
Emmily ~ Roses are red, Peas are green, My face is a laugh, But yours is a scream Posted Jan 8, 2005
Hi kiteman, I used to have a stunt kite when I was young, had great fun with it, loop the loop and dive bombing, as well as the challenge of just controling it.
Nice to have a few Entries on kite flying.
Just a few very basic suggestions for all your kite Entries
Add the links to 'two-lined kits' etc. rather than 'this article' (need to change the sentence a little)
Where you have double quotes, they ought to be single quotes.
And where you have words all in Caps, either Bold or Italic are usually standard for Edited Entries.
In headers/subheaders suggest capitalise first letter of main words
You can find out more at EditedGuide-Style
I notice your using lowercase letters in GuideML ie although they work, Caps. is standard for Edited Entries. You can find out more at EditedGuide-GuideML
Emmily
A3292913 - Single-Line Kites: a basic glossary.
Kiteman Posted Jan 8, 2005
Thanks, Emmily, all suggestions noted and I'm working through the set to sort them all.
Somebody suggested putting all these articles into one megachunk. Would that be a good idea, or would a smaller article with links to all the other be better?
Kiteman (Mark)
A3292913 - Single-Line Kites: a basic glossary.
Emmily ~ Roses are red, Peas are green, My face is a laugh, But yours is a scream Posted Jan 8, 2005
Yes, I think it would a good idea to put them all in one Entry.
It would save repeating same information, be easier to read than going from link to link (as multi Edited Entries) and easier in PR to reply to one Entry rather than several.
You could if you chose to, use a to seperate each section.
Emmily
A3292913 - Single-Line Kites: a basic glossary.
Kiteman Posted Jan 8, 2005
Hey, Em, I've just noticed the times of your messages. Do you ever sleep??
A3292913 - Single-Line Kites: a basic glossary.
Emmily ~ Roses are red, Peas are green, My face is a laugh, But yours is a scream Posted Jan 8, 2005
yes, but have various sleep problems (including amonst other thing a snoring partner) and often stay up late/get up during night, though I was asleep between 2am and 9am last night, or should I say this morning
Emmily
A3292913 - Single-Line Kites: a basic glossary.
Kiteman Posted Jan 8, 2005
I don't envy you.
I'm putting the articles together into one, as suggested, but it does feel very long. Is there some way of adding internal links that would let a reader jump from a list of contents to the section they want (like the 'back to top' buttons some web pages have)?
A3292913 - Single-Line Kites: a basic glossary.
Emmily ~ Roses are red, Peas are green, My face is a laugh, But yours is a scream Posted Jan 9, 2005
I don't know a good person to ask this, if no one else has answered it, is SEF, she's brilliant at anything 'technical'
Emmily
A3292913 - Single-Line Kites: a basic glossary.
Mu Beta Posted Jan 9, 2005
You've been hard at work, Kiteman.
I haven't looked at all the entries yet, but if they're as comprehensive readable as this one, they should sail (no pun intended) into the Edited Guide, no problem.
I would be inclined to take the opposite view to Emmily. As you say, putting them all together would make a very long entry and be quite time-consuming. Best to leave them as they are, I think, and if the decision is made higher up to combine them, that's then a job for the Subs or Editors. But then I've always been a fan of succinct entries.
B
A3292913 - Single-Line Kites: a basic glossary.
Kiteman Posted Jan 9, 2005
Thanks, Master B.
I've had a quick html lesson, and fit something called a subanchor into my (growing) long version. I haven't finished it yet, but feel free to have a look at it as it stands in My Space (A3493703).
A3292913 - Single-Line Kites: a basic glossary.
Emmily ~ Roses are red, Peas are green, My face is a laugh, But yours is a scream Posted Jan 9, 2005
I wasn't sure how to answer so went to read replies in other Kite Entry converstation ~ F48874?thread=562037 a Scout had replied, and I thought what he said made sense, so followed his example.
It's been a very quiet weekend, I've sure they'll be some more opinions soon.
Emmily
A3292913 - Single-Line Kites: a basic glossary.
Emmily ~ Roses are red, Peas are green, My face is a laugh, But yours is a scream Posted Jan 9, 2005
I've just had a horrible thought Kiteman.
Re ~ Your question in Post #7
>"Is there some way of adding internal links that would let a reader jump from a list of contents to the section they want (like the 'back to top' buttons some web pages have)?"
If they are called 'anchor links'I don't think they are allowed in Edited Entries.
If you've already added them to long Kite Entry, I suggest you leave them for now, until you get confirmation one way or the other.
Emmily
A3292913 - Single-Line Kites: a basic glossary.
Sea Change Posted Jan 10, 2005
I've been posting in PR for about 4 years now, and I am sure I have seen final Edited Entries with anchor links, but they are always added by the subby or the editor.
A3292913 - Single-Line Kites: a basic glossary.
Sea Change Posted Jan 10, 2005
I think it's important to know about the kinds of string and kinds of materials that spars and sails can be made from. Are these not basic bits of information?
You mention different kinds of tails; how about flags, parachute men, and other line laundry?
A3292913 - Single-Line Kites: a basic glossary.
Emmily ~ Roses are red, Peas are green, My face is a laugh, But yours is a scream Posted Jan 10, 2005
Another thought Kiteman
A suggestion for a compromise between five small Entries and one mega.
Two Entries, maybe a something like 'Beginners Kite Flying' and 'Advanced Kite Flying'
I missed a bit of GuideML before, where you have numbered lists rather than using ~
Like this:
A kite.
Some flying line.
A handle or reel to wind it onto.
That automatically numbers them, so need need for numbers.
Emmily
A3292913 - Single-Line Kites: a basic glossary.
Mu Beta Posted Jan 10, 2005
Being the experience Sub that I am **cough, cough**, I think anchor links are fine. We don't usually use them internally in an entry, though - just when linking to a relevant section of another entry.
B
A3292913 - Single-Line Kites: a basic glossary.
Emmily ~ Roses are red, Peas are green, My face is a laugh, But yours is a scream Posted Jan 10, 2005
*Phew* glad to hear that Master B
You can stop coughing now, and let go of your lapels I'm trying to learn the 'ropes of a Scout' I'm gonna make a few errors along the way, so long as there only small errors though.
I thought I'd put Kiteman through finding out about 'internal entry' links, then not being able to use them, I would've felt a right plonker
I went back to the thread where I read about anchor links, can see how I thought they weren't allowed from this:
>"No links to executable files allowed in Edited Guide entries. Also, EG entries usually avoid anchor links as well -- if you look at the right hand side of the entry where all of the external links are shown, it should be obvious why."
At the time I read it as anchor links were not allowed, I scratched my head, and thought what's an anchor link? I didn't know until Kiteman said what he'd put in Entry.
So, just so I've got this right, anchor links are allowed, but not encouraged...ooopppsss if so I was still wrong
"No links to executable files" What are they?
Emmily
A3292913 - Single-Line Kites: a basic glossary.
Kat - From H2G2 Posted Jan 10, 2005
*flies in*
Okay here are a few small things to change
lauching>>launching
although there are many variations on the themes
although there are many variations to each theme
compund>> compound
Anchor links AREN'T allowed in Edited Entries. I asked once and was informed NOPE.
I don't think that you should put them into one large article, as you said...huuuge article then! What you COULD do is erm...this.
Kites | More Kites | These Kites | Those Kites | Kites for Me | I Hate Kites
If you put that at the top of each article you do for kites, then readers can quickly go between each article...plus it looks pretty neat
Kat
Key: Complain about this post
Peer Review: A3292913 - Single-Line Kites: a basic glossary.
- 1: Kiteman (Jan 7, 2005)
- 2: Emmily ~ Roses are red, Peas are green, My face is a laugh, But yours is a scream (Jan 8, 2005)
- 3: Kiteman (Jan 8, 2005)
- 4: Emmily ~ Roses are red, Peas are green, My face is a laugh, But yours is a scream (Jan 8, 2005)
- 5: Kiteman (Jan 8, 2005)
- 6: Emmily ~ Roses are red, Peas are green, My face is a laugh, But yours is a scream (Jan 8, 2005)
- 7: Kiteman (Jan 8, 2005)
- 8: Emmily ~ Roses are red, Peas are green, My face is a laugh, But yours is a scream (Jan 9, 2005)
- 9: Mu Beta (Jan 9, 2005)
- 10: Kiteman (Jan 9, 2005)
- 11: Emmily ~ Roses are red, Peas are green, My face is a laugh, But yours is a scream (Jan 9, 2005)
- 12: Emmily ~ Roses are red, Peas are green, My face is a laugh, But yours is a scream (Jan 9, 2005)
- 13: Sea Change (Jan 10, 2005)
- 14: Sea Change (Jan 10, 2005)
- 15: Emmily ~ Roses are red, Peas are green, My face is a laugh, But yours is a scream (Jan 10, 2005)
- 16: Mu Beta (Jan 10, 2005)
- 17: Mu Beta (Jan 10, 2005)
- 18: Mu Beta (Jan 10, 2005)
- 19: Emmily ~ Roses are red, Peas are green, My face is a laugh, But yours is a scream (Jan 10, 2005)
- 20: Kat - From H2G2 (Jan 10, 2005)
More Conversations for Single-Line Kites: a basic glossary.
Write an Entry
"The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is a wholly remarkable book. It has been compiled and recompiled many times and under many different editorships. It contains contributions from countless numbers of travellers and researchers."