Number Six: The Semi-Forgotten Amendment
Created | Updated Jan 28, 2002
I will attempt here to explain this amendment in detail.
Amendment Six
"In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense"
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is a pretty complicated wording, so I will try to explain it. I'll break it down into important phrases, and the first important phrase is "the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial". This is put in to ensure that the person accused of a crime will not be made to wait in jail for an abnormal period of time before his or her trial.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Then comes "by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed". What this means is the accused person's fate will be decided by a jury that is not prejudiced one way or another, and that the jury should be from the same area as the accused person.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
After that, the next important item is "... to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation". This means that any person arrested should be told what crime they are accused of and why they have been accused.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Next up is "to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor". This is a complicated way of saying that, if the accused person knows of someone who can help prove him innocent, he has the ability to force that person to testify.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Lastly is "and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense". This means that the person accused of a crime has the right to have a lawyer present with him at all times before and during the trial.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nowhere has this last part become more evident than in the case of Ernesto Miranda Vs. the State of Arizona. In this case, the accused, Miranda, did not know he could have a lawyer with him, and was forced into giving a confession. Miranda, convicted of kidnapping, was pardoned by the Supreme court Because Miranda was unaware of his rights. The direct result of this case are the "Miranda Rights", which must be read to a person upon their arrest. If they are not read, then the arrest is invalid and the person may go free.