A Conversation for The Underguide - Good or Bad?
"What is the UG needed for?"
Terran Started conversation Aug 22, 2003
To fill in the gaps that the Edited Guide leaves.
"What is the UG needed for?"
spook Posted Aug 22, 2003
The EG is all about facts, ie goes in the factual secton of the library. it is the factual section of the library. the question was whether the Ug was needed as a 'part of' the fiction library, as it acts as if it is 'the' fiction section, when there are already parts of the fiction section about. my problem is that instead of becoming a part of it was trying to take over and be the whole lot.
spook
"What is the UG needed for?"
J Posted Aug 22, 2003
You do realize it's creative, not fiction. Several things are non-fiction and factual, such as the entry 3 Popes, but are unsuitable for the UG for one reason or another.
Key: Complain about this post
"What is the UG needed for?"
More Conversations for The Underguide - Good or Bad?
- "the UG has been in talk for months and is yet to be start working" [12]
Sep 7, 2003 - "Entries need no skill of writing or work to gain status, but can simply be written thoughts" [46]
Aug 24, 2003 - "From that list it certainly looks like the Underguide is a bad idea, there are significantly more Cons, than Pros." [14]
Aug 23, 2003 - "Other Alternative Writing Schemes not taken into due consideration" [13]
Aug 23, 2003 - "Entries commented on by similar people, community not getting into the AWW"? [6]
Aug 23, 2003
Write an Entry
"The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is a wholly remarkable book. It has been compiled and recompiled many times and under many different editorships. It contains contributions from countless numbers of travellers and researchers."