A Conversation for The Underguide - Good or Bad?
"Do we really need h2g2 to become more complicated?"
Terran Started conversation Aug 22, 2003
Right! Thats it, no more Smiley's then. No more new skins. HEy what the hey, lets not post any more comments then.
Come on spook!
"Do we really need h2g2 to become more complicated?"
J Posted Aug 22, 2003
The only difference made so far is C1233
And the only forseeable major differences are a front page appearance, which would apparently be used for community things anyway. The Post got a smiley, a named entry and a front page slot and that is all good and useful. We aren't asking for a smiley or a named entry just yet, and I don't really see the need to.
Satisfied spook?
Key: Complain about this post
"Do we really need h2g2 to become more complicated?"
More Conversations for The Underguide - Good or Bad?
- "the UG has been in talk for months and is yet to be start working" [12]
Sep 7, 2003 - "Entries need no skill of writing or work to gain status, but can simply be written thoughts" [46]
Aug 24, 2003 - "From that list it certainly looks like the Underguide is a bad idea, there are significantly more Cons, than Pros." [14]
Aug 23, 2003 - "Other Alternative Writing Schemes not taken into due consideration" [13]
Aug 23, 2003 - "Entries commented on by similar people, community not getting into the AWW"? [6]
Aug 23, 2003
Write an Entry
"The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is a wholly remarkable book. It has been compiled and recompiled many times and under many different editorships. It contains contributions from countless numbers of travellers and researchers."