A Conversation for Earthquakes - the Human Perspective
Rollers vs. Jerkers
Blatherskite the Mugwump - Bandwidth Bandit Started conversation Jan 11, 2000
As a native Californian, I've been through hundreds of quakes, and every time there's a major one, the people from the earthquake center at CalTech University get on the news and turn us all into earthquake experts. As such, I can tell you that the jerking kind of earthquake is to be preferred. Although it seems more violent, it is over with quickly. Slow rollers that exceed 30 seconds in duration are generally the most destructive type. The Northridge quake was of this type, as was the San Fran quakes of 1901 and 1991, the Landers quake of 1992 (7.5), the Big Bear quake of 1992 (6.9, it hit the same day as the Landers quake...a very adventurous day). In fact, I'd be willing to bet that all of history's most destructive quakes were the roller types, but I'd expect some exceptions from places like Turkey and Mexico, where the building codes are close to nonexistent.
Key: Complain about this post
Rollers vs. Jerkers
More Conversations for Earthquakes - the Human Perspective
Write an Entry
"The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is a wholly remarkable book. It has been compiled and recompiled many times and under many different editorships. It contains contributions from countless numbers of travellers and researchers."