A Conversation for The Turing Test
The Turing Test is more than merely flawed, I'm afraid...
Lear (the Unready) Started conversation Jul 23, 2000
I think the Turing Test has effectively been discredited as a possible means of assessing the possible 'intelligence' of a machine. John Searle's 'Chinese Room' analogy pretty much demolished it a number of years ago. I have written a short piece on the subject @ http://www.h2g2.com/A399549 where I give a more detailed justification for a sceptical attutide towards Artificial Intelligence.
The Turing Test is more than merely flawed, I'm afraid...
Martin Harper Posted Sep 14, 2000
I feel I should add "for some people" to the avove comment. Personally, I think it's simplistic, but still stands, and John Searle needs to get some heavy programming practice before he comes up with any more nonsense. I'm not alone...
that was a public information broadcast only - didn't want Lear's overly confident post to go unoppossed...
The Turing Test is more than merely flawed, I'm afraid...
Lear (the Unready) Posted Dec 26, 2000
Thanks for that Lucinda (or Red, I'm never quite sure what to call you)...
Here's another Public Service announcement, for the hard of understanding. The h2g2 scoutarounds enjoyed Searle's 'nonsense' so much they decided to put it into the edited Guide. That isn't necessarily a great recommendation, bearing in mind some of the crap that gets in there. But anyway, here's the new address, just for the record :- http://www.h2g2.com/A486047
PS - Programming practice? Pshaw! Maybe you behaviourists could study a little philosophy someday...
Key: Complain about this post
The Turing Test is more than merely flawed, I'm afraid...
More Conversations for The Turing Test
Write an Entry
"The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is a wholly remarkable book. It has been compiled and recompiled many times and under many different editorships. It contains contributions from countless numbers of travellers and researchers."