h2g2 The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy: Earth Edition

Is there any kind of official, or even unofficial, agreement as to how long a Peer Review post should be left sitting before a Scout comments about it? I know it might seem like nitpicking, but I've got at least two entries that haven't been commented upon in 2 months. I realise there may be issues with the number of Scouts or the time they can be expected to give to 'the job' - but I should think it's a question in peoples minds, especially for those that aren't quite as prolific in posting as myself and may be looking dejectedly at their single post on the PR page which was posted two months ago and has now sunk, without trace, to the bottom of the pile untouched.

Sorry it has taken so long to get back to you, I was netless at the weekend there OK there is no official position on how long before something is reviewed, we try and get everything reviewed, but some slip through the cracks When I have time I try and run through the backlog and check on all the ones that have slipped way back, JimiX does something similar too (I am not sure about the other Scouts). Unfortunatly RL has been extremly hectic so I have had less time for h2g2 recently The amount of choices that a Scout can give, every month has been ramped up, and will be again in the near future, so before crimble, hopefully, there will be more digging being done by Scouts. On another note Scouts are not the only ones who can comment on Entries, give ideas etc. Also I have a list of Entries I have read and thought they were able to become Edited Entries, so if I have no time in a month to review I can still pick. There are a couple of your Entries in that list As always patience is the watchword, at least until the old queue system is finally worked out of the system. I hope this rambling speil helps, if it doesn't just yell and point out the bit that you cannot understand, and I will try and explain it better Well, until later....
BCNU - Crescent