h2g2 The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy: Earth Edition

A16059648

I've not done anything to it yet a the main body is absolutely fine.

Might I make a suggestion? You have 4 subheaders numbered. I don't think we need the numbers. What do you think?

Apart from putting some links in, I can't find anything wrong with it.

I'll give you a shout when I've put some links in.

VV

Hi Vicki!

The only reason I used the numbers is because the PCN's list the grounds for appeal in that order, numbered. On the off chance that someone was holding a PCN and reading the Entry to work out what to do with it, the numbering may be useful. But that's pretty unlikely...

Hmm, links. Are they compulsory? I rather liked this one without any links. I normally use a smattering of them, but I felt that links might take some concentration away from the text in this one. We ought to have one to NPAS at least I suppose.

http://www.parking-appeals.gov.uk/

If you do add links, any chance of just sticking them in the side bar thingy on the right hand side, rather than getting blue streaky things all over my lovely bland text?

Final thing - you might like to look at the capitalisation in the headers. Not sure exactly which words should have capitals or not.

OK. You have a point with the numbers thingy. I'll leave it as it is.

I've also tried to go through and find hootoo links to attach to this one, but I can't find any appropriate ones.

I think in this case we shall leave it without any links, so long as you're happy with this. I'll also bring this to the attention of the italics when I return it so they're aware of it.

That sounds fine to me!

*blows a kiss*

Off it goes then!!!

Hey Vicki!

Some errors have crept in since we sent it back. I think the hyphenating-hamsters have been at it.

I can raise them in EF, but since this is not yet edited, my experience is that they often get overlooked.

Do you have a little back door access to the hamsters cage? If not, then I'll leave it until it hits the FP and then get one of the curators to do it.

Did the problems get sorted out?

DDD has wiped his PS and unsubbed from all his convos, VV

Hi GB, I'm still puzzled thatz he managed to even delete his edited entries in the brunel skin
I do hope he'll be back at some point.

Hi B'Elana,
It's one thing to wipe your PS and hide your nickname, but deleting edited entries is pretty drastic
I don't know what's happened
I hope he will be back too *leaves a for DDD*

The entries are still there in the other skins, which is why I'm not suer it isnÄt a glitch. I reported it, but never got a reply from Jim Lynn. I mean, you can't delete edited guide entries, can you?
DDD, id you read this, please come back, don't leave hootoo because of ONE person! There are so many people who miss you.

You can't delete edited entries no, I meant remove your name from them. One of my collaborate entries has a gap, between the contributing researchers, where someone had clicked "remove my name" - but I'm in Classic Goo and I never use the other skins, so I don't know what it looks like with them.

I don't know of this "one person" you mention, B'Elana, sorry.

It was something that happened in PR, I have no idea who I am talking about, though.

Oh
I must have missed it.

Really? How can you have missed the 'How to skin a cat' PR?

I read the thread quite early (but not the entry) and haven't read it since.

The posts had been yikesed before you read it. The entry was re.instablished, the posts weren't - or that's what I gathered. I read the entry - or rather the first part of it, then skipped the rest, couldn't bring myself to read it. I unsubscribed at an early point, some people fell out over the entry, which I think is very bitter.

I've now read the entire thread (still not the entry though) I understand it was the first time DDD had ever been modded.

What a shame, if that was the cause.

It was , as far as I understood. Not the initial modding, because they have to react to a complaint, but that it wasn't re-instated - or is it back now?

No, the modded posts aren't back.

I can't really comment, because I don't know what they did say.