A Conversation for The Milky Way Galaxy
- 1
- 2
Peer Review : A27527312 - The Milky Way Galaxy
Galaxy Babe - eclectic editor Started conversation Sep 23, 2010
A27527312 - The Milky Way Galaxy
BMT Posted Sep 23, 2010
There's me thinking you were writing about a bar of
Nice, compact yet detailed piece GB. Not even a nitpick.
BMT Scout
A27527312 - The Milky Way Galaxy
Lanzababy - Guide Editor Posted Sep 23, 2010
Indeed, BMT is correct - a faultless Entry!
as always I find I am learning a little about astronomy each time I read one of your pieces GB.
Lanzababy
A27527312 - The Milky Way Galaxy
lil ~ Auntie Giggles with added login ~ returned Posted Sep 24, 2010
A27527312 - The Milky Way Galaxy
lil ~ Auntie Giggles with added login ~ returned Posted Sep 24, 2010
A27527312 - The Milky Way Galaxy
Gnomon - time to move on Posted Sep 29, 2010
"a thick stream of stars can be seen stretching from horizon to horizon" - I think this is confusing, because people will assume you are talking about things that look like stars. The Milky Way doesn't look anything like stars. It looks like a stream of light. It is only through a telescope that you can see that it is made up of stars.
The way you describe it, there is the central hub, then a spherical halo around that, then coming out of the halo there are the arms, forming the disc. In fact the halo is as big as the disc, so the arms lie within the galactic halo, like a hamburger made from a flat disc of meat (the arms) in a spherical bread bun (the halo).
I think it is confusing to mix light years and kiloparsecs in the same sentence. You should stick to light years, as they are easy to understand. Convert "around three kiloparsecs" to "around 10,000 light years".
You don't need to develop the fictional "warp drive" to leave the solar system - there are many other ways it could be done which are physically possible, although a bit slow.
A27527312 - The Milky Way Galaxy
Galaxy Babe - eclectic editor Posted Sep 29, 2010
I don't understand what you mean by >>You don't need to develop the fictional "warp drive" to leave the solar system<<
I wrote:
"Unless, of course, humans have developed warp drive and ventured out into the cosmos!"
I meant, far enough to witness the demise of the Milky Way from outside of it.
I have done some of your other suggestions but haven't time to finish as I have to run my son to his club
A27527312 - The Milky Way Galaxy
Rudest Elf Posted Sep 29, 2010
Is this <(in the UK))> really necessary? More than 100 countries have a postcode system.
Footnote 5 repeats the word 'which' - Do you think it would read better with the first 'which' changed to 'that'?
A27527312 - The Milky Way Galaxy
Gnomon - time to move on Posted Sep 30, 2010
To me, saying 'unless we invent warp drive' is like saying 'unless we discover magic'. They're both impossible by the laws of physics as we know them.
But there are perfectly possible ways of leaving the solar system to avoid the destruction of the earth - as you know, some spaceships have already left the solar system. So it is possible that there will be people around in 6 billion years time to witness the collision of the Milky Way Galaxy and M31, without invoking magic or the warp drive.
On a different topic, it has been speculated that the star Arcturus, a close neighbour of our sun, is actually part of the Galactic Halo rather than the spiral arm of the galaxy. It is travelling very quickly in a completely different direction to all the other stars around us, and is 'just passing'.
A27527312 - The Milky Way Galaxy
Galaxy Babe - eclectic editor Posted Oct 4, 2010
The reference to warp drive wasn't necessary for this article so I've removed it.
That's very interesting about Arcturus (that it is actually part of the Galactic Halo rather than the spiral arm of the galaxy), do you think it should be added to A757352?
Congratulations - Your Entry has been Picked for the Edited Guide!
h2g2 auto-messages Posted Dec 21, 2010
Your Guide Entry has just been picked from Peer Review by one of our Scouts, and is now heading off into the Editorial Process, which ends with publication in the Edited Guide. We've therefore moved this Review Conversation out of Peer Review and to the entry itself.
If you'd like to know what happens now, check out the page on 'What Happens after your Entry has been Recommended?' at EditedGuide-Process. We hope this explains everything.
Thanks for contributing to the Edited Guide!
Key: Complain about this post
- 1
- 2
Peer Review : A27527312 - The Milky Way Galaxy
- 1: Galaxy Babe - eclectic editor (Sep 23, 2010)
- 2: BMT (Sep 23, 2010)
- 3: Lanzababy - Guide Editor (Sep 23, 2010)
- 4: Galaxy Babe - eclectic editor (Sep 24, 2010)
- 5: lil ~ Auntie Giggles with added login ~ returned (Sep 24, 2010)
- 6: Galaxy Babe - eclectic editor (Sep 24, 2010)
- 7: lil ~ Auntie Giggles with added login ~ returned (Sep 24, 2010)
- 8: Gnomon - time to move on (Sep 29, 2010)
- 9: Galaxy Babe - eclectic editor (Sep 29, 2010)
- 10: Rudest Elf (Sep 29, 2010)
- 11: Galaxy Babe - eclectic editor (Sep 30, 2010)
- 12: Gnomon - time to move on (Sep 30, 2010)
- 13: Galaxy Babe - eclectic editor (Oct 4, 2010)
- 14: Gnomon - time to move on (Oct 5, 2010)
- 15: BMT (Oct 12, 2010)
- 16: Galaxy Babe - eclectic editor (Oct 12, 2010)
- 17: Galaxy Babe - eclectic editor (Oct 29, 2010)
- 18: Galaxy Babe - eclectic editor (Nov 12, 2010)
- 19: The H2G2 Editors (Dec 21, 2010)
- 20: h2g2 auto-messages (Dec 21, 2010)
More Conversations for The Milky Way Galaxy
Write an Entry
"The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is a wholly remarkable book. It has been compiled and recompiled many times and under many different editorships. It contains contributions from countless numbers of travellers and researchers."