A Conversation for Church of Scientology of Moscow Wins Religious Recognition at European Court of Human Rights

Edited Guide Writing Workshop: A22009790 - Church of Scientology of Moscow Wins Religious Recognityion at European Court of Human Rights

Post 1

getjohn

Entry: Church of Scientology of Moscow Wins Religious Recognityion at European Court of Human Rights - A22009790
Author: getjohn - U8177118

Some newsworthy case


A22009790 - Church of Scientology of Moscow Wins Religious Recognityion at European Court of Human Rights

Post 2

Whisky

http://www.scientologytoday.org/press/704042347361_scn-int.html

Copy/Paste of an existing webpage


A22009790 - Church of Scientology of Moscow Wins Religious Recognityion at European Court of Human Rights

Post 3

getjohn

That's right, Scntoday printed it as provided to them. Anything I missed?


A22009790 - Church of Scientology of Moscow Wins Religious Recognityion at European Court of Human Rights

Post 4

Whisky

Anything you missed - yup, the other site's copyright rules and this site's copyright rules... Sorry


A22009790 - Church of Scientology of Moscow Wins Religious Recognityion at European Court of Human Rights

Post 5

Hoovooloo


"Anything I missed?"

Well, for starters, this, apparently: A53209

And specifically the big red letters that say "Do not copy wholesale from other sources".

Do

you

understand?

SoRB


A22009790 - Church of Scientology of Moscow Wins Religious Recognityion at European Court of Human Rights

Post 6

getjohn

The problem in conversation with you is that there is no conversation happening. All I can see you doing is trying invalidate my religion. I believe this is somewhat in violation of the House Rules for this place but since I did only read them after posting myself (sorry for that) you can have a grace period as well.


A22009790 - Church of Scientology of Moscow Wins Religious Recognityion at European Court of Human Rights

Post 7

Hoovooloo


See, Mr. Buttnor, you don't seem to have a handle on how conversations actually work.

For instance, you posed a question. "Anything I missed?".

I, participating in a conversation, ANSWERED the question, by demonstrating what it was that you had missed.

Your response is a non-sequitur. You've simply ignored what I've posted. You then, ironically, complain that no conversation is happening. Worse, you do so in a post that you have spammed across three threads in less than a minute. This behaviour in itself is a violation of h2g2 House Rules.

I'll let it go this time and not complain to the moderators, because you're new here and very obviously not that bright. But do try to demonstrate at least a glimmer of human consciousness, can't you?

SoRB


A22009790 - Church of Scientology of Moscow Wins Religious Recognityion at European Court of Human Rights

Post 8

Whisky

Hmmm, I think I should be selling smiley - popcorn to the onlookers - SoRB v Religion is always a good spectator sport

smiley - biggrin


A22009790 - Church of Scientology of Moscow Wins Religious Recognityion at European Court of Human Rights

Post 9

Wilma Neanderthal

getjohn, are you the author of the article on the website? If not, publishing it here is plagiarism... against house rules.

smiley - ok
W


A22009790 - Church of Scientology of Moscow Wins Religious Recognityion at European Court of Human Rights

Post 10

Alfster



Spamming the same message into numerous threads is also against house rules.


Key: Complain about this post

Edited Guide Writing Workshop: A22009790 - Church of Scientology of Moscow Wins Religious Recognityion at European Court of Human Rights

More Conversations for Church of Scientology of Moscow Wins Religious Recognition at European Court of Human Rights

Write an Entry

"The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is a wholly remarkable book. It has been compiled and recompiled many times and under many different editorships. It contains contributions from countless numbers of travellers and researchers."

Write an entry
Read more