This is the Message Centre for Gnomon - time to move on

Planetary Art

Post 21

Lanzababy - Guide Editor

zilch - nothing at all I'm afraid, why should there be? smiley - bigeyes


Planetary Art

Post 22

Gnomon - time to move on

That's interesting, Deke, because it may indicate a problem with that Eris picture.


Planetary Art

Post 23

Gnomon - time to move on

Ah, I see what your problem was, Deke. It's not a problem with the pictures themselves but with the way I'd laid them out, so if you've a narrow screen, the Uranus picture would overlap the Eris picture. I've changed the layout now to overcome this.

This is not a serious quiz. The answer is blindingly obvious a disgrace to the Astronomy pages here on h2g2.


Planetary Art

Post 24

Galaxy Babe - eclectic editor

Lanzababy: you don't see a "pic by (the photographer)" when you scroll over the photos?


Planetary Art

Post 25

Gnomon - time to move on

Lazababy has already said that mouse-overs don't work on her browser. They don't work on my Mozilla Firefox either, so I've taken to using IE.


Planetary Art

Post 26

Lanzababy - Guide Editor

I can right click and 'inspect element' which will give information about the image.

I found that IE kept freezing this laptop, so I changed, first to firefox, which allowed in some horrible malware and then to Chrome.


Planetary Art

Post 27

Baron Grim

I never get mouse-over text on h2g2. I have to right click to image properties to see the alt text. I use firefox in ubuntu. I get mouse-over text on other websites just fine.


Planetary Art

Post 28

Galaxy Babe - eclectic editor

I recall when I was creating those Hall of Fame photo pages that some people couldn't read the photographer, and Traveller told me a way to adjust the coding so everyone could read itsmiley - erm

I had no idea that they were still unreadable to some.


Planetary Art

Post 29

Recumbentman

Credits appear when I mouse-over in IE, zilch in Chrome.


Planetary Art

Post 30

Recumbentman

Hm . . . in your collection Jupiter and Venus look remarkably similar . . . is one misattributed?


Planetary Art

Post 31

Galaxy Babe - eclectic editor

Jupiter would have looked more recognisable with a red spotsmiley - ok


Planetary Art

Post 32

AlsoRan80

Oh dear!

CME
AR80
19/10/09
9.45 BST


Planetary Art

Post 33

Gnomon - time to move on

The "Alt" tag on the image is not actually intended as mouse-over text. It is intended as text which is displayed when for some reason the picture is unavailable. This could be because the user has chosen not to display pictures because of the time it takes to download them, or for security reasons or because they are blind.

Microsoft decided to add a feature that the browser would display alt text when you hover over the picture, but that is not the purpose of the tag.


Planetary Art

Post 34

Galaxy Babe - eclectic editor

The spidery scrawl on "Eris" has gone nowsmiley - wizard


Planetary Art

Post 35

Gnomon - time to move on

Great! I don't think the picture is up to much, but God probably didn't bother producing a thing of beauty when he created Eris. He just cobbled together a pseudo-planet, as he didn't think anybody would be looking at it.


Planetary Art

Post 36

Baron Grim

I'm waiting for an as yet undiscovered dwarf planet to be named "Rupert".


Planetary Art

Post 37

Galaxy Babe - eclectic editor

smiley - laugh


Planetary Art

Post 38

Recumbentman

Somewhere in the Great Bear?


Key: Complain about this post