A Conversation for Pictures: Sex
Disappointing
Frankie Roberto Started conversation Apr 27, 2002
If you came across this page just by it's title ('Pictures: Sex'), you'd be thoroughly disappointed when you find out what's here.
Disappointing
h2g2Support Posted Apr 29, 2002
Oh I don't know, I quite like the picture of the dominatrix. 
What would your suggestion for a title be?
Disappointing
Frankie Roberto Posted Apr 29, 2002
Oh, I've no real suggestion really. The page title just cropped up in the search engine whilst I was looking for something else, and I was intriged, but disappointed... 
Disappointing
Frankie Roberto Posted Apr 29, 2002
Well if you will go putting mis-leading titles on pages...
Disappointing
h2g2Support Posted Apr 29, 2002
You're reading smut in a perfectly polite title. So there. 
Disappointing
Frankie Roberto Posted Apr 29, 2002
It's not quite as smutty as 'Pictures: Mark Moxon' would be...
Disappointing
spook Posted Oct 3, 2002
i agree that the title is definately misleading. How about:
Pictures: Romance and Relationships
that would be much more accurate. either that or create some much more sex related pictures.
spook
Disappointing
spook Posted Oct 3, 2002
actually i was looking for a sex related picture to use for my column in the post but i foudn the ones here very disappointing. u don't think u could get one of your artists to draw a picture of a nude girl with black lines over the doggy areas with the words 'CENSORED BY THE BBC' on the black lines. that would be great if u could do that, and it would be perfect for my article.
spook
Disappointing
Mina Posted Oct 3, 2002
By 'doggy' I assume that you mean 'dodgy'. Am I the only one who's not impressed with having parts of a woman's body described as 'dodgy'? 
Of course, if you do mean 'doggy' then I need this smiley - 
Disappointing
spook Posted Oct 3, 2002
i do mean dodgy, and i mean dodgy as in suitability for h2g2, if u know what i mean.
Disappointing
Mina Posted Oct 3, 2002
I'm still not happy with being called dodgy.
A526213 has a picture that you might find useful, right at the bottom.
Disappointing
spook Posted Oct 3, 2002
well, i to tell the truth i couldn't really think of a suitable word at the time so dodgy seemed ok.
the picture looks like just the type of thing. is there a larger version of it or does it only appear as a small picture?
spook
Disappointing
Mina Posted Oct 3, 2002
It's only a small one I'm afraid, which is why it doesn't appear in the graphics library.
Disappointing
spook Posted Oct 3, 2002
oh well. i might include it in the article, i might not. thanks for your help anyway.
just thinking about it, maybe there should be a section in the graphics library for minature pictures.
what do u think?
Disappointing
Mina Posted Oct 3, 2002
There aren't that many to be honest, these are the only ones that I personally know of.
Disappointing
spook Posted Oct 3, 2002
well, for minature pictures u could include some of the small pictures that feature on the front page.
Key: Complain about this post
Disappointing
- 1: Frankie Roberto (Apr 27, 2002)
- 2: h2g2Support (Apr 29, 2002)
- 3: Frankie Roberto (Apr 29, 2002)
- 4: h2g2Support (Apr 29, 2002)
- 5: Frankie Roberto (Apr 29, 2002)
- 6: h2g2Support (Apr 29, 2002)
- 7: Frankie Roberto (Apr 29, 2002)
- 8: h2g2Support (Apr 29, 2002)
- 9: Frankie Roberto (Apr 29, 2002)
- 10: spook (Oct 3, 2002)
- 11: Frankie Roberto (Oct 3, 2002)
- 12: spook (Oct 3, 2002)
- 13: Mina (Oct 3, 2002)
- 14: spook (Oct 3, 2002)
- 15: Mina (Oct 3, 2002)
- 16: spook (Oct 3, 2002)
- 17: Mina (Oct 3, 2002)
- 18: spook (Oct 3, 2002)
- 19: Mina (Oct 3, 2002)
- 20: spook (Oct 3, 2002)
More Conversations for Pictures: Sex
Write an Entry
"The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is a wholly remarkable book. It has been compiled and recompiled many times and under many different editorships. It contains contributions from countless numbers of travellers and researchers."