h2g2 The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy: Earth Edition

Entry: Space aint that complicated Boys! - A59730537
Author: Vroomboo - U14221888

By the bigger brains:0)

Nice explanation. But wrong.

Now this is definitely something I'd say is better suited to the AWW. You can check it out at <./>Writing-Alternative<./>.

Ooops, sorry. Writing-Alternative

I don't think I follow. Do you think the author noticed h2g2's <./>writing-guidelines</.> or read about <./>peer-review</.>?

If it was factually correct, it might make a nice change from the drier explanations. But it unfortunately isn't. The stars don't appear to be receding because the universe is spinning.

That's why I suggested the AWW.

As free verse, it's not bad. As a scientific explanation, it's not correct.

Prove it.

I'm Right.

Current Science Thinking is WRONG.

Vroomboo ESA

Mmmmmm, no.

The burden of proof lies with you.

And the place to prove it isn't Peer Review, because the Edited Guide is not for publishing your own theories. So unless it does become established contemporary science, this is not the place for it.

Please read the Writing-Guidelines again. Especially the bit where it says "...home-grown theories and contemporary poetry [are] not what we're looking for in the Edited Guide. Even if the subject of your entry isn't that well-known, the historical, scientific or cultural relevance should be fairly established if it's aimed for the Edited Guide."

Since this piece doesn't meet the criteria, please remove it from PR to help us keep the place tidy Simply go back to PeerReview, click the little "X" next to the Entry, and confirm that you want to remove it. Don't worry, that won't delete it entirely - it'll still be there on your Personal Space to do with as you please!

Perhaps you'd still like to discuss the issue? In that case, you can check out <./>Askh2g2</.>, that's the most-frequented forum here.

(Thanks, Vroomboo. I see you've found Ask, too, so I'll just leave you to it. )