This is the Message Centre for anhaga

Head for the Hills #5

Post 1

anhaga

Truly, this is the impending doom of the world:

'PAUL Wolfowitz, the deputy US defence secretary and a chief architect of the Iraq war, was being mooted last night as a leading candidate to become the 10th president of the World Bank.'

http://www.theherald.co.uk/news/34480.html


Head for the Hills #5

Post 2

Gnomon - time to move on

'We won't give your country a loan because we have reliable evidence that you are hiding 'plans for mass expansion' from us. The UN inspectors haven't found any, but we know they are there. No, we can't reveal our sources.'


Head for the Hills #5

Post 3

anhaga

smiley - laughsmiley - wah


Head for the Hills #5

Post 4

taliesin

smiley - laughsmiley - sadfacesmiley - wah

It jes' keeps gittin' better 'n better, don't it?

Think ah'll find me a nice, deep cave in them thar hills... smiley - run


Head for the Hills #5

Post 5

DA ; Simply Vicky: Don't get pithy with me!

<>

Oh no! Head for the hills stuff indeed. smiley - grr


Head for the Hills #5

Post 6

rev. paperboy (god is an iron)

Put Paul Wolfowitz in charge of the World Bank? That is so far out of the realm of the sensible I have to believe its a joke.
It would be like putting a someone who believes in torture in charge of law enforcement in the United States, it is completely nu....oh wait


Head for the Hills #5

Post 7

anhaga

And here, from the Institute for Policy Studies, the Top Ten Reasons Why Paul Wolfowitz Would Make a Good World Bank President:

http://www.ips-dc.org/comment/wolfowitz.htm

smiley - rofl


Head for the Hills #5

Post 8

DA ; Simply Vicky: Don't get pithy with me!

Interesting! smiley - peacedove


Head for the Hills #5

Post 9

anhaga

a little update collection courtesy of Truthout.org:

http://www.truthout.org/docs_2005/031705B.shtml


Head for the Hills #5

Post 10

rev. paperboy (god is an iron)

i see the moderates are already claiming this is just a sop by Bush to the far right - when will these people wake up and realize that neither this appointment, nor the appoint of John "the UN does not exist" Bolton, nor the appointment of Al "it's not torture unless it causes organ failure" Gonzales are sops to the right, but the actions of a right-wing extremist president. What is it going to take? The appointment of a Flangist to the office of faith-based initiatives? A new Kristalnacht?

Since the Reagan and Thatcher years (and I'd include Mulroney in this too) the strategy of the right whenever and wherever they have held power has been to push the center to the right by means of fear-mongering, bribing the people with their own money, campaigning against government and the neo-con game of "starving the beast" through tax cuts and pandering to strident patriotic nationalism.

Since the early 1980's we've have been treated to politicians on the right constantly wailing in alarm about street crime, violence and drugs that are destroying our cities. About the proliferation of WMD and so-called rogue states and creating domestic crises to push their own policies - the coal strike in the UK that was used to break the British trade union movement, the various ill-fated attempts at constitutional reform in Canada under Mulroney, the current social security "emergency" cooked up by Bush the Younger - these are all "crises" created by the governments in question to allow them to further their own agenda in the solution.


A right-wing government cuts taxes and promises to cut spending and "waste" and "red tape" that is handcuffing free enterprise. They trot out the most extreme cases of govt funded research into obscure fields, or funding given to narrow-focus advocacy groups they can find and ridicule it. They make a sweeping promise to cut the civil service ("everybody knows how lazy those darn bureaucrats are - govt should be run like a business") and turn hundreds, even thousands of govt employees out into the street. When the remaining staff can no longer deliver adequate services due to lack of manpower, they decry this as further proof of government inefficiency and impotence.

Meanwhile the tax cuts are all to aid the corporate sector and the wealthy. The "waste" that is cut is usually in fields like education and social service spending: "useless" things like support for teachers and social workers, halfway houses and drug treatment programs. Mental health facilities in particular took a huge hit in the Reagan era, leading to the current epidemic of homelessness among the borderline and often not-so-borderline mentally ill. Subsidization of post-secondary education is cut "because it favors elitism" when in reality it is now only the elite who can afford university. Health care subsidization is cut and private care encouraged, because socialized medicine is "socialism" and doctors deserve to take part in the free market system as much as anyone else.

The red tape that gets cut are things like environmental standards and enforcement (see Ontario under the Harris government, the USA under Bush) corporate oversight and financial regulation.

The right campaign on a platform of fiscal responsibility and keep hammering on the size of the public debt to scare the electorate into voting for "fiscal conservatism" and when they get into office, reduce the government's income by cutting taxes while reallocating (and often increasing) spending to pay private contractors to provide the government services they have cut at a higher cost and with less accountability. If the government-run agency screws up, the politicians take the heat, but if the private contractor screws up, the politicians can wring their hands and say they didn't know about it, it was a private firm and so they had no control.

With less money coming in, the deficit gets bigger, giving the right wing politicians further ammunition to cut more government programs. Most schools in Ontario used to have good art, music, sports and drama programs. Not anymore, they werer cut in 90's as "too expensive in the current dire financial climate" Most provincial parks in Ontario replaced government employees (with living wages and benefits) with private contractors (much lower wages, no benefits) for all but senior management jobs.

As the Bruce Cockburn song says "the trouble with normal is it always get worse" - the more of these changes that are made, the more people accept them and the more willing they become to accept even more heavy-handed measures. What would have been completely unacceptable to most people in 1975 or even 1985 (The Patriot Act, machinegun-toting National Guardsmen in airports forcing people to take off their shoes, "free speech" zones away from Presidential speeches, the hate rhetoric of Ann Coulter, the ten commandments in court rooms and the teaching of creationism in schools to name a few off the top of my head) is no longer even blinked at.

Germany, Italy and Spain did not become facist states overnight - the facists created the conditions for their seizing of power over a number of years before provoking unrest and even civil war to allow them to impose a military solution to "protect peace."

That is what we are watching right now in the United States.




Head for the Hills #5

Post 11

taliesin

smiley - applause

smiley - bleep -ing good rant, rev

smiley - cheers


Head for the Hills #5

Post 12

rev. paperboy (god is an iron)

well a slightly more considered version with some additional notions on moving the pendulm and the use of propaganda are on the blog at
www.kevinswoodshed.blogspot.com


Head for the Hills #5

Post 13

rev. paperboy (god is an iron)

well, since the link didn't seem to take, I'll save you the trouble

"The use of misinformation and outright propaganda is essential to the task of moving the center. When conservatives railed against crime in the streets and the need for getting tough on crime in the 80s and 90s, the crime rate was actually lower than it had been in the 70s and going down. Since they couldn't rely on statistical evidence, they would dredge up anecdotes about the most brutal crimes they could find and then act as though brutal crime had not existed before 1965, Jack the ripper and Lizzie Borden notwithstanding. The media ran with the anecdotes rather than the scientific recording of actual trends because gory anecdotes always make better copy than dry statistics. Sins of ommission are the most common type of media offense - telling us all about American Idol or Martha Stuart or Michael Jackson's day in court rather than the bankrupcy bill that just handed credit card companies the right to seize people's homes or the debate over social security reform. I'm sure when the U.S. congress eventually introduces a bill calling for a military draft, the lead story on CNN is going to be Brittany Spears miracle baby or the discovery that some mental defective in Utah who has cooked and eaten the babysitter.

As the Bruce Cockburn song says "the trouble with normal is it always get worse" - the more of these changes that are made, the more people accept them and the more willing they become to accept even more heavy-handed measures. What would have been completely unacceptable to most people in 1975 or even 1985 (The Patriot Act, machinegun-toting National Guardsmen in airports forcing people to take off their shoes, "free speech" zones away from Presidential speeches, the hate rhetoric of Ann Coulter, the ten commandments in court rooms and the teaching of creationism in schools to name a few off the top of my head) is no longer even blinked at. The political pendulum swings back and forth from left to right, but in the 80s, Reagan, Thatcher and Mulroney managed to move the top of the pendulum itself to the right, so when it swung back to Clinton, Blair and Chretien, it didn't go very far to the left, but stopped just to the right of what used to be the center. Now as it swings to the right again, the center is being pulled with it, ensuring a sort of creeping facism will be with us for years, perhaps generations to come."




another posting from yestersday

Nice to see one finally admit it

"That’s me, a marine, a murderer of civilians" This interview with U.S. Marine Jimmy Massey by Patrizio Lombroso of Il Manifesto appeared the day before Giuliana Sgrena was released and shot. It’s an interview not calculated to win love and friendship in official Washington circles.‘

“I’ve seen the horror that we were causing every day in Iraq. I have been part of it. We are all just murderers.“We kill innocent Iraqi civilians all the time. That’s the way it is. I believe they need to withdraw all foreign military troops in Iraq right away. And I say this about other soldiers: to avoid punishment or reprisals by the military, they don’t want to talk and admit that killing terrorists is not our mission. It’s to kill innocent civilians.”

http://kevinswoodshed.blogspot.com


Head for the Hills #5

Post 14

anhaga

Wolfy is going to have a tough time of it at the World Bank:

'Don't deposit Wolfowitz with us, plead World Bank workers'

http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1441350,00.html


Key: Complain about this post