patterns in the isralie media
Created | Updated Aug 7, 2003
I will take out all the chatty bits before any one who looks at this complanes I am just writing my thaughts before I rearange evrything and I shupoose the titul could be jewish insted of isralie because I am not looking at the palastinian pappers.
first problems britten is anti semetic acorsding to them.
it was called anti semetic for
not suppliying parts for phantom bombers after an agreement about the use of brittish maide tankes was broken by israel.
bler meeting with arab leaders (oh my god how terrible)
blear not having time to meet with the isralie foren minister on a trip with very little notification (some reports say 3 weeks other say 1 weeks) now ok a few weeks is a bit of tiem but not alot in political scheduals.
blear was also acused of trying to interfear with the election in israel becuse he meet with the leader of the laber party and not the foren minister (as said above) who is from a differant party. the fact that the laber leaders trip was planned months in advance means nothing.
america the god,
most papers here seem to think that america can do no wrong over verious and in my opinion dongy (I should change that word I supose) things e.g.
basically saying that they will have a woar with iriak with or without a reasion.
desiding that the UN have no authority over american desicions (wich ok it dosent but they then try to hide behind un resalutions when critasied)
jews should get spechal treatment.
examples, verious nieve comments such as Iraq using chemical wepons against the jewish people is insensative in light of the holocost. oh give it a break for christ sake how is it ever sensativce to gass any one? and if jhe was willing to gas them would he really care if he was being sensative?
other strange staments inclood decideding that the cathlick faith teaches its member to hate jews (i dont like any religion to be honist but I know rthat to be wrong
first problems britten is anti semetic acorsding to them.
it was called anti semetic for
not suppliying parts for phantom bombers after an agreement about the use of brittish maide tankes was broken by israel.
bler meeting with arab leaders (oh my god how terrible)
blear not having time to meet with the isralie foren minister on a trip with very little notification (some reports say 3 weeks other say 1 weeks) now ok a few weeks is a bit of tiem but not alot in political scheduals.
blear was also acused of trying to interfear with the election in israel becuse he meet with the leader of the laber party and not the foren minister (as said above) who is from a differant party. the fact that the laber leaders trip was planned months in advance means nothing.
america the god,
most papers here seem to think that america can do no wrong over verious and in my opinion dongy (I should change that word I supose) things e.g.
basically saying that they will have a woar with iriak with or without a reasion.
desiding that the UN have no authority over american desicions (wich ok it dosent but they then try to hide behind un resalutions when critasied)
jews should get spechal treatment.
examples, verious nieve comments such as Iraq using chemical wepons against the jewish people is insensative in light of the holocost. oh give it a break for christ sake how is it ever sensativce to gass any one? and if jhe was willing to gas them would he really care if he was being sensative?
other strange staments inclood decideding that the cathlick faith teaches its member to hate jews (i dont like any religion to be honist but I know rthat to be wrong
