The Philosophical Problem

0 Conversations

Artificial Intelligence provoked some deep discussion. We bring you some of the highlights.

The Philosophical Problem

Shapes filling the mind.

Willem and Dmitri1, this is an article I submitted to the Post but it seems more appropriate to put it here as it addresses some of the points you have raised:

The well-known physicist David Deutsch expressed the opinion2 that the failure of scientists to produce anything remotely resembling true artificial intelligence (or Artificial General Intelligence as it is usually referred to now) over the past sixty years is a result of ignoring the philosophical problems inherent in the project.

According to most dictionaries, Intelligence is the faculty of understanding that allows us to use our knowledge and skills to solve problems by manipulating our environment and ever since Descartes decided that the only route to indubitable knowledge was the radical separation of mind and matter explicit in the 'Cogito', philosophy has struggled with the problem of what we mean by knowledge and how we acquire it.

One answer to this is Communitarianism: the problem with recognising Descartes as the starting point for modern philosophy is his focussing on the autonomous individual as the repository of knowledge, whereas the immanentism of Aristotle and Hegel and the holistic views promoted by Jan Smuts, Alfred Adler and others have provided an alternative view of the individual as an instantiation of human knowledge. This approach reconnects us with the original idea of philosophy as, literally, the love of wisdom, where love is the ability to become one with another individual through empathy (generally referred to in philosophy as Hermeneutics) and wisdom is to understand the connections that make up the Big Picture (that is, the social world we inhabit).

According to this view, then, something can only be considered intelligent if it is able to recognise intelligence and awareness in others. This can be seen to be true when we think about very young children being able to stare at a stranger without embarrassment: their self-awareness has not yet developed to the point where they understand that what they are looking at is a self-aware individual. Arthur C. Clarke thought that machines would have this level of self-awareness by 2001 but his HAL9000 suffered from the very moral problems that proponents of artificial intelligence are presumably hoping to do away with.

But this still leaves us with the problem of what the human brain is doing when it exhibits intelligence. The electrochemical activity in the brain is an entirely material process so does this mean that we are already an example of artificial intelligence? If we are then any idea of Free Will would be meaningless; all our actions would be as predictable as the fall of Newton’s apple. At the moment the alternative views, ranging from quantum tubules in the brain to the idea that humans have a spirit or soul, seem to have very little evidence to support them. In which case there would seem to be no reason why a machine could not eventually develop an individual identity in the same way that humans have but, presumably, the machine being a product of human engineering would imply the human world expanding to include the sentient machine and, consequently, the machine would have to be considered a human rather than an artificial intelligence.

Ed. Note: This discussion became very fruitful. If you'd like to read the rest of it, we recommend you mosey over to the bottom of Thinking About Thinking, click on the thread marked 'Built to Last', and join in. We're sure we can lick this consciousness problem if we just get enough h2g2ers to think about it long enough.

Create Archive

Chris Morris

27.02.17 Front Page

Back Issue Page

1See remarks in Thinking About Thinking and Built to Last.2'Philosophy will be the key that unlocks artificial intelligence', The Guardian, October 3, 2012.

Bookmark on your Personal Space

Conversations About This Entry

There are no Conversations for this Entry



Infinite Improbability Drive

Infinite Improbability Drive

Read a random Edited Entry

Written by



h2g2 is created by h2g2's users, who are members of the public. The views expressed are theirs and unless specifically stated are not those of the Not Panicking Ltd. Unlike Edited Entries, Entries have not been checked by an Editor. If you consider any Entry to be in breach of the site's House Rules, please register a complaint. For any other comments, please visit the Feedback page.

Write an Entry

"The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is a wholly remarkable book. It has been compiled and recompiled many times and under many different editorships. It contains contributions from countless numbers of travellers and researchers."

Write an entry
Read more