Khadra
Created | Updated Sep 16, 2010
"Dr" Khadra,
M793
<quote>How can speciation be accepted as a fact when there is no evidence to support the theory. Speciation requires long periods of time to happen. We have no physical evidence to substantiate it. Not even in the sparse fossil records we have. </quote>
How many lies can one person cram into a single short paragraph?
Speciation in bacteria can happen in a day, as you would know if you really did have the PhD in "Micro Biology" that you claimed. It has been watched happening many times in living populations of bacteria, viruses, fish, molluscs, birds, tortoises...
We do not need the fossil record to show that evolution/speciation occurs. We have enough hands-on evidence from the living world.
<quote>Yes, Darwin’s “Theory”</quote>
If you actually did have the doctorate you claimed, you would know that "theory" is science-speak for "established to the best of human abilities".
<quote>The answer is clear to me. DNA.</quote>
That is not a mechanism or process. That is a chemical (which you would know if you knew anything about science at all, never mind the infamous doctorate).
Tell us, what is the *mechanism* that prevents DNA mutating so far, but no further? What mechanism restrains evolution to adaptations within a species?
M795
<quote>Every claim that Mormons have made have been substantiated. The book of Mormon has been archeologically verified, as well as by other scientific methods.</quote> Oh yes? Where is *your* physical evidence? No links, please, just the physical evidence, same as you demand of evolution. Show us the plates or they never existed.
<quote>It was translated by a 14 year old illiterate farm boy.</quote>Show us this boy. Show us his illiterate scratchings. Physical evidence, remember - to present anything else is not acceptable, you say.
<quote>Mormons have no paid ministry and fully support themselves without claiming a penny from the state.</quote>Oh? So they have given back all the tax breaks they get as a registered religion?
<quote>The American Military make a concession to Mormons allowing them 2 years paid leave to serve a mission.</quote>More fool they.
<quote>Mormons are the only religion they do this with simply because they value the integrity of Mormons. </quote>Other religions run their missions *without* draining their host nations of valuable resources.
<quote>A survey was conducted in the USA. Employer were asked if they were confronted with two candidates for a job, one being a Mormon the other being a atheist which one would they choose. 95% choose the Mormon on the grounds that they are honest and virtuous.</quote>
Evidence, please. Actual physical evidence, Doctor Khadra. Name the employers, give us their phone numbers, or it's just hear-say, according to you.
M796
<quote>Leave out the text book teach and show me the evidence.</quote>Why should I bother? You have had first-class evidence handed you on a plate, and you have dismissed it as hear-say! Did you refuse to look in text books when you earned your honouree degree? Or your PhD?
<quote>Text books are just words in a book.</quote>As opposed to the bible, or the book or Mormon, which are...?
<quote>Out of the 50 States in America they produce the most Scientists per capita. Simples teach</quote>
5,580,200 scientists in America. Fifty states. That's an average of 111,604 per state. Tell me again how 2000 Mormons is "most"? I teach maths as well; seemples.
<quote>I said that they produced more scientist then any other state.</quote> As we have seen above, that is wrong, but let's quickly look back to your M788, this thread:<quote>he significance of Mormons producing more scientists then any other state in the USA and I expected the squirming and wriggling but that does not change the fact that devout Christian have been the greatest contributors to scientists for 60 years.</quote>
What is "the greatest contributors", if not a majority?
And why only sixty years? Why not the full 180 years?
Of the general population of the United states, 1 in 55 people is employed in a scientific role.
According to your data, just over than 1 in every 1400 Utah citizens is a scientist.
Tell us again about the "most", Doctor Khadra...
---------------------
M797
<quote>Oh Right. You must be right then and I must be wrong. Forget the total lack of evidence and just take your word for it then.</quote>
Your have asserted that falsehood many times. Do you think that repeating falsehoods somehow makes them true?
Or do you just think that nobody will remember you posting it before?
<quote>Your the first person to mention mammals so why do assume that I don't know this</quote>
What's wrong with mentioning mammals? Did you not know you are a mammal as well as an ape, Doctor?