Is womb rental morally/socially acceptable?
Created | Updated Aug 4, 2010
Of all technologies, I hate the technologies that interfere in the natural reproduction of mankind! These days, renting wombs of poor women by rich women is becoming fashion. Is this morally and socially acceptable? Who would be the mother of the child finally? The woman who developed the feutus feeding from what she eat and drink or the one whose eggs fertilized?
In my opinion, human reproduction needs to be left to nature except medical treatments. Renting a human body is no different from considering human beings just as commodities and that is also not different from enslavement, though not forced one. Those renting their womb cannot be condemned as they do not have choice for survival. It is governments which should be condemned for failure to create enough job opportunities. If there were enough job opportunities, humans could not prefer enslavement.
What do religious people do observing this chaos? Are they not responsible to keep God’s order? Why don’t they cry loud stopping such technologies?
In my opinion, human reproduction needs to be left to nature except medical treatments. Renting a human body is no different from considering human beings just as commodities and that is also not different from enslavement, though not forced one. Those renting their womb cannot be condemned as they do not have choice for survival. It is governments which should be condemned for failure to create enough job opportunities. If there were enough job opportunities, humans could not prefer enslavement.
What do religious people do observing this chaos? Are they not responsible to keep God’s order? Why don’t they cry loud stopping such technologies?
