Error Functioning and The Seatbelt Boy
Created | Updated Oct 31, 2003
Acrually it didn't occur that a process of methodalogical perfection was worth perpetrating since science had,in fact,not really reached that completely clarity oriented proliferation we now enjoy in application.Instead of research money being appropriated to perfect the seatbelt and shoulderharness the cosmetic renasianance faction was agreed on in proper democratic considerative process.So error functioning reaches the new hieght we now enjoy,with, of course the co-commitment.
Error functioning might explain the continuity of complexity,momentum,and indoctrination but the hand of the assialent is in fact present.The experiential,non-theoretical,being the controlling factor by default might just encourage you to ask "What was the nature of the sudden "strategic" consideration in the rejection of scientific experimantation and perfection",but the point that anaethma, was the discussion even, was the point that had already made science the real fallguy.Since problematical is the next great leap forward, seatbelt boy,later, rejoins the co- commitment and expands his consideration of necrophelic behavior as rejectionable,wholely. Continuity,momentum,and indoctrination does re-emphasize the more general post initiative. Error functioning being defined as the on going continuence of the indefinable and further along a strategic consideration does readdress the both specific and that general anti-science that could begin the diversion,of a predictable nature, to it's ultimate establishment.You simply continue to attach the stick to the stone and find swinging the stick seems to be ineffective.Maybe a bigger stick ?
Seatbelt boy continues his error functioning along the timeline,but the continuity of error functioning does refer to the previous intialization for continuence. What does result from freeing the enslaved Europeans with Wilson's entry into the Great War,overlooking the destructive termination of Germany without considering the potential consequences ? The founding of Liberal Progressiveism or simply the beginiing of the infrastrctures power base that evolves on until the present. Is the evolutionary process questionable in an error functioning context or simply considerable as repititous behavior that learning,experientialy,is derived ?