h2g2 The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy: Earth Edition

To spot near by object trails would require almost constant monitoring of the differences between successive whole sky images?

After reading an article in NS(27/3/10)"the last word", about the Rayleigh criterion, it seems unlikely that the Planck images would have enough resolution to pick out planet sized objects heading our way, and even less likely to see trails made by them or NEO`s?

This weeks last-word (NS.2/4/10), "You cannot be serious",asks about the Hawk-eye line judging system. Would you need a similar tracking system to spot trails through the interstellar gas medium?

The intrinsic(spin) magnetic moment of an electron is 2.00232 times larger than q.L/2m,amp meters sq. Could the extra 0.00232 be due to space-time being dragged around the electron?

Inflation theory could be mis-interpreting, a falling substance (probability particles?) media pressure gradient, towards our galaxy`s singularity?

Is inflation an example of the Boltzmann Transport Equation?

Could Inflation Theory`s expanding space-time, be due to the erosion of light & matter`s probability wave particles into the smaller faster gravity particles, as they are compressed into & out of the larger subatomic particles(electrons, protons,..,)?

Milo Wolff`s spherical standing wave theory, may provide a solution to the problem of; where do weak Boson particles obtain their mass? Standing wave amplitude between the interacting particle pair becomes higher as they approach each other, which allows them to interact with more gravity media particles, hence more mass.

Spin half particles require 720 degrees of rotation to get back to the start (like rolling same radius coin around each other`s circumference). Presumably Up & down spin half particle are due to them having a plus or minus phase shift with reference to a non up or down spin half particle, although the phase shift will need be less than 360 degrees otherwise it becomes an anti-spin half particle, with again the possibility of an anti up & down phase shift?

Sorry, that`s not right, anti particles spin the other way round. When Electron change into their Neutrino counterpart, the particle still has spin half although no plus or minus charge, since it should now occupy the 360 degrees of phase shift position, the charge may still exist (although imaginary), but only influence (detectable by) other neutrinos?

Are electron-neutrino attracted to positron-neutrino, and muon-neutrino attracted to anti-muon-neutrino, and tau-neutrino attracted to anti-tau-neutrino? Well they may do if a neutrino is a lepton with a phase shifted spin?

If a neutrino is an electron which has had its spin phase-shifted, then not only will its electric charge be out of phase, but since mass is an emergent property of interacting gravity particles with the charge media, it to, is out of phase with normal mass?

What if the idea of a phase shift to a spin-half particle, is applied to quark particles? If a phase shift from a charge of minus one to zero is equivalent to a phase shift of 360 degrees( spin-half has 720 degrees of freedom) then the down quarks minus one third charge would be phase shifted by 360/3=120 degrees? And the Up-quark by 240 degrees the other way round? The Quarks charge and mass would then be the sum of real and imaginary parts?

what effect does the sum of these extra out of phase masses from neutrinos and quarks have, for instance, on our galaxy and objects within and outside of?

If Neutrinos have mass & electric charge, that`s out of phase with normal mass & electric charge, would they gather together as clouds of particles around their own centers of gravitational attraction? If a Neutron has an out of phase charge of minus 1, could a neutrino with a positive out of phase charge orbit the Neutron?

Could Dark matter & Energy, be the out of phase spin component of normal matter & energy? Hence Dark Bosons would interact with the Dark component of normal matter(Dark Forces)?

For more on Polarization & Spin see" mathpages.com ". Dirac`s equation requires modification to include the possibility that spin may be phase shifted( need maths help ) ?

Rotation Matrices turn a ball around by an angle theta degrees with reference to axis x,y & z, but an electron has no x, y & z axis to rotate around, instead it absorbs and re-radiates a spherical pressure wave( sum of the incoming pressure waves, from other electrons), each of which having a similar frequency, although differing phases. An applied magnetic field sifts out the electrons into those with a more up phase angle from those with a more down phase angle?

The quantum number "n" is the integer count of electron anti-nodes, the higher the "n" the higher the standing wave frequency & the smaller the electrons volume. Rather than a cloud of possible electron locations, could the matter particle media support shells of spherical waves one within the other? Just as quarks are inside a shell, is it spherical standing wave shells all the way down, or up in terms of energy & frequency?

If neutrons are electrons with out of phase component spherical standing waves, could mass have three flavors, normal (kg), dark(d-kg) and anti-dark(a-d-kg)?