A Conversation for The History of the Digital Watch

Pity

Post 1

Demon Drawer

You lost the quote from the opening as the rest of hte article makes no sense as a result as it was referred to in other parargraphs.


Pity

Post 2

Demon Drawer

So I guess it must be Ashley on this one not realising the significance of the quite then. smiley - winkeye


Pity

Post 3

Demon Drawer

That should be quote not quite pushed the wrong finger down on my right hand there.


Pity

Post 4

Tango

Do you enjoy talking to yourself? smiley - winkeye

Jimster should a) subscribe to his subbing entries and b) no better than to remove a DNA quote. smiley - cross

Tango


Pity

Post 5

Demon Drawer

I've shouted at the H2G2 eds page today and am getting action on the issue. Will refrence the original article once it gets posted on front page in a nice thread for all true h2g2 fans.


Pity

Post 6

Tango

I saw the feedback thread. That's how i found this very nice entry. smiley - smiley

Tango


Pity

Post 7

Demon Drawer

Thank you I was amazed no one had done it sooned what with the subject matter being soi inexplicably linked to the great man's writing.


Pity

Post 8

Smij - Formerly Jimster

Well, the thinking was that those who know the relevance would see why we've published it in our birthday week (sadly, once it had wormed its way through the editing process it was too late for the day itself) and wouldn't need reminding, while those who didn't see the relevance wouldn't be confused by a quote which was included just to point out that some people think digital watches are 'neat'.

As I said to DD at the time, it was a superb piece of research that we felt didn't need propping up with a quote from our founder when it was strong enough to stand on its own.

Jimster
(not Ashley)


Pity

Post 9

Ashley



>>> Jimster
(not Ashley)

So nah-nah-nah-nah-nah


smiley - winkeye


Key: Complain about this post