This is the Message Centre for Giford

Summarise this!

Post 1

Clive the flying ostrich: Amateur Polymath | Chief Heretic.

Was speaking the the I.P lawyer at work about a book I am reading on The Sun (star) he has a relation who is a published academic astronomer - and so he begins talking about the subject of cosmology, and he brings up Immanuel Velikovsky, and I sound a sceptical note but concede I've not read any of his work.

Knowing of your (on-going) debate with Noggin, I was just wondering if you could summarise for us non-historians, what is the Velicovsky's position and what (IYO) is wrong with it.

I mean, I could google, but I'd like to sound you out first. smiley - smiley

Thanks. smiley - smiley

Summarise this!

Post 2


The debate I'm having covers only the 'respectable corner' of Velikovsky's work, his wanting to wipe a few hundred years off of Egyptian history.

It's rooted in his better-known work, the idea that a chunk of Jupiter was ejected into space, barely missed the Earth (causing an axis shift) and became the planet Venus.

Among other teensy problems, it violates the conservation of angular momentum and the conservation of energy.

Gif smiley - geek

Key: Complain about this post

Summarise this!

More Conversations for Giford

Write an Entry

"The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is a wholly remarkable book. It has been compiled and recompiled many times and under many different editorships. It contains contributions from countless numbers of travellers and researchers."

Write an entry
Read more