A Conversation for Games Room
Nice brainteaser
PedanticBarSteward Posted Oct 17, 2005
I know this one so I won't spoil it for the others.
Nice brainteaser
Sheep in wolfs clothing Posted Oct 17, 2005
I also know it, but will spoil it as it has skipped over on to a new page:
He is a midget and can't reach the 11th floor button. When it's raining, he has his umbrella and can reach the button.
Nice brainteaser
Sheep in wolfs clothing Posted Oct 17, 2005
Now for the new teaser:
There is a knockout tennis tournament with 55 people entered. How many matches of tennis are played in total before they arrive at an eventual winner?
Note that there are no rematches or repecharges and byes are allowed as there are an odd number of entrants.
Also, for those that get this the long way (drawing up match plans and counting the number of matches at each round), can you explain a simple way of calculating the number of matches, which is applicable regardless of the number of entrants?
Nice brainteaser
PedanticBarSteward Posted Oct 17, 2005
53 -
53>27 matches +1 player
27>13 matches +1 player
13>6 matches +1 player
6>3 matches
3>2 matches +1 player
The four spare players >2 matches
27+13+6+3+2+2=53 (I think)
Nice brainteaser
PedanticBarSteward Posted Oct 17, 2005
Sorry - Triping errer
55>27 matches +1 player
Nice brainteaser
PedanticBarSteward Posted Oct 17, 2005
Trying to be too clever too quick - is it 54? -
55 players play 27 matches & thereÕs 1 player left over
26 players play 13 matches
13 players play 6 matches & thereÕs 1 player left over
The two players left over play 1 match
So there are seven players left
7 players play 3 matches & thereÕs 1 player left over
3 players play 1 match & thereÕs 1 player left over
The two players left over play 1 match
The two winners play the final 1 match
The losers play for second place 1 match
27+13+6+1+3+1+1+1+1+1 = 54
Nice brainteaser
Sheep in wolfs clothing Posted Oct 18, 2005
It is 54, but do you know the quick method and reason behind it?
Nice brainteaser
RebelRaven Posted Oct 18, 2005
The answer to Gollum's riddle is, if i'm not mistaken, time.
Another Tolkien Riddle in the Dark is:
It cannot be seen, cannot be felt,
Cannot be heard, cannot be smelt.
It lies behind stars and under hills,
And empty holes it fills.
It comes first and follows after,
Ends life, kills laughter.
Nice brainteaser
RebelRaven Posted Oct 18, 2005
oops! actually in right place! man this is confusing!
can anyone think what it might be?
Nice brainteaser
Kyra Posted Oct 18, 2005
You answered a post from the first page.
I think the answer's darkness but I'm not sure.
It doesn't matter anyway, I think it's PBS's go next.
Nice brainteaser
RebelRaven Posted Oct 18, 2005
yep, i did, which makes me feel a little less of a fool.
The answer is dark, but darkness is the same kind of thing.
If PBS wants to continue, i'll have to find my book of The Hobbit. I like riddles, but i have a very bad memory!
Nice brainteaser
Sheep in wolfs clothing Posted Oct 18, 2005
PBS: it’s your turn.
Just to close the loop on my question, the simple way of working out the number of games in a knockout competition is to take the number of entrants and take off 1. The reason is that everyone, except the winner, loses one match. Therefore, it doesn’t matter how many games you win or how you organise the byes through to the next round. Conventional knockout tournaments would have 46 players playing 23 matches in the first round, with 9 players having a bye to the next round. Then you have 32 players in 16 matches etc.
Nice brainteaser
PedanticBarSteward Posted Oct 18, 2005
Sorry - even I have to go and work occasionally - I am trying to break the habit. I had also just about got round the shortcut to the tennis solution as I was waiting. It is neat.
So - a new problem:
Two men went into a restaurant. They both ordered the same dish from the menu. After tasting it, one of the men knew that he had eaten his friend. How did he know?
Nice brainteaser
Sheep in wolfs clothing Posted Oct 18, 2005
I know this one, so won't spoil someone else's fun. When I did hear it, there was more information supplied.
Nice brainteaser
Gem - leave a message and I'll get back to you!! Posted Oct 19, 2005
Well that solved that then didn't it. Didn't it?
His friend was the animal that he was eating (I thought it might have been a lobster from the tank (some restaurants keep a tank full of lobsters)and that he had come to like the lobster, but one day decided he wanted lobster and violla as they say.
Probably wrong though - right?
Nice brainteaser
PedanticBarSteward Posted Oct 19, 2005
Right - you are wrong, I am afraid. No animals involved unless you count the albatross in the soup - which could equally well be a seagull.
Key: Complain about this post
Nice brainteaser
- 121: PedanticBarSteward (Oct 17, 2005)
- 122: Sheep in wolfs clothing (Oct 17, 2005)
- 123: Sheep in wolfs clothing (Oct 17, 2005)
- 124: PedanticBarSteward (Oct 17, 2005)
- 125: PedanticBarSteward (Oct 17, 2005)
- 126: Sheep in wolfs clothing (Oct 17, 2005)
- 127: PedanticBarSteward (Oct 17, 2005)
- 128: Sheep in wolfs clothing (Oct 18, 2005)
- 129: RebelRaven (Oct 18, 2005)
- 130: Kyra (Oct 18, 2005)
- 131: RebelRaven (Oct 18, 2005)
- 132: RebelRaven (Oct 18, 2005)
- 133: Kyra (Oct 18, 2005)
- 134: RebelRaven (Oct 18, 2005)
- 135: Sheep in wolfs clothing (Oct 18, 2005)
- 136: PedanticBarSteward (Oct 18, 2005)
- 137: Sheep in wolfs clothing (Oct 18, 2005)
- 138: PedanticBarSteward (Oct 18, 2005)
- 139: Gem - leave a message and I'll get back to you!! (Oct 19, 2005)
- 140: PedanticBarSteward (Oct 19, 2005)
More Conversations for Games Room
Write an Entry
"The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is a wholly remarkable book. It has been compiled and recompiled many times and under many different editorships. It contains contributions from countless numbers of travellers and researchers."