A Conversation for SEx - Science Explained
SEx: quantum physics--particle in a box
kalindra ((1*4*3+0)*3+2+4)=42 Started conversation Mar 16, 2010
I'm in a quantum chemistry class, and our prof used quantum physics to prove that if you have one particle in a box, since the equations he was using are not time-dependent, the particle exists at all points in the box simultaneously. Ignoring that for the moment, we used Hamiltonian physics to derive this equation:
Phi=sqrt(2/L)sin(Pi*x/L) where the particle is in a one-dimensional box of length L. If n=1, Phi vs. x is a sine curve with a maximum at L/2. Now, even though according to the prof Phi has no actual physical meaning, Phi^2 is the probability density of the particle. So this means that the probability of the particle is highest in the middle of the box. In class, I asked my prof whether this implies that if you had multiple particles they would be concentrated toward the middle of the box. His response was "There's only one particle in the box." So he's not going to be any help. So... if you have a one dimensional box will there be more particles in the middle? I know it's a standing wave and all that, I just want to know how this relates to reality.
SEx: quantum physics--particle in a box
kalindra ((1*4*3+0)*3+2+4)=42 Posted Mar 16, 2010
Ha, thanks, I'll have to remember that for the midterm.
SEx: quantum physics--particle in a box
Amy Pawloski, aka 'paper lady'--'Mufflewhump'?!? click here to find out... (ACE) Posted Mar 16, 2010
How can a box be one dimensional? *resisting rooting out copies of Flatland and Sphereland*
*is bemused that Firefox recognizes Flatland and not Sphereland*
SEx: quantum physics--particle in a box
8584330 Posted Mar 16, 2010
Two particles in a box:
http://www.nyu.edu/classes/tuckerman/honors.chem/lectures/lecture_7/node3.html
" ... there is zero probability to find both particles in small regions near the same point." So it is unlikely that both particles will be in the middle.
SEx: quantum physics--particle in a box
Taff Agent of kaos Posted Mar 16, 2010
isn't this hiezenberg????
policeman: scuse me sir, do you know how fast you were going???
physisist: no! but i knew exactly where i was!!!!
SEx: quantum physics--particle in a box
Orcus Posted Mar 16, 2010
The model he uses is solvable because it is one particle. So it two but it is more complex as the particles will (assuming same charge) repel one another.
Put three in there and it's a three body problem and you get the really interesting stuff in quantum theory - it's not solvable mathematically (too many variables with not enough knowns) and one starts having to use assumptions and approximations.
SEx: quantum physics--particle in a box
Gnomon - time to move on Posted Mar 16, 2010
When you put two particles in the box, you 've a completely different set of equations, and you have to solve it separately and find out what happens. It's not really possible to work it out from the one particle example.
SEx: quantum physics--particle in a box
IctoanAWEWawi Posted Mar 17, 2010
Orcus, obligatory xkcd posting:
http://xkcd.com/613/
SEx: quantum physics--particle in a box
kalindra ((1*4*3+0)*3+2+4)=42 Posted Mar 17, 2010
Okay, thanks everyone!! I'll survive this class somehow...
SEx: quantum physics--particle in a box
Alfster Posted Mar 19, 2010
Abtruse goose does a nice line in geek strips these days too...certainly not a copy of xc-whatever.
http://abstrusegoose.com/28
and the archives:
http://abstrusegoose.com/archives
Key: Complain about this post
SEx: quantum physics--particle in a box
- 1: kalindra ((1*4*3+0)*3+2+4)=42 (Mar 16, 2010)
- 2: Taff Agent of kaos (Mar 16, 2010)
- 3: kalindra ((1*4*3+0)*3+2+4)=42 (Mar 16, 2010)
- 4: Amy Pawloski, aka 'paper lady'--'Mufflewhump'?!? click here to find out... (ACE) (Mar 16, 2010)
- 5: 8584330 (Mar 16, 2010)
- 6: Taff Agent of kaos (Mar 16, 2010)
- 7: Orcus (Mar 16, 2010)
- 8: Gnomon - time to move on (Mar 16, 2010)
- 9: IctoanAWEWawi (Mar 17, 2010)
- 10: Orcus (Mar 17, 2010)
- 11: kalindra ((1*4*3+0)*3+2+4)=42 (Mar 17, 2010)
- 12: Alfster (Mar 19, 2010)
More Conversations for SEx - Science Explained
- Where can I find tardigrades? [26]
May 25, 2020 - SEx: Why does it hurt [19]
May 14, 2020 - SEx: Does freezing dead bodies kill any diseases they may have? [6]
Sep 12, 2019 - Is it going to be life in an artificial pond ? [4]
Sep 4, 2019 - SEx: What is the difference between a psychopath and a sociopath? [16]
Feb 18, 2019
Write an Entry
"The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is a wholly remarkable book. It has been compiled and recompiled many times and under many different editorships. It contains contributions from countless numbers of travellers and researchers."