Arbiter CandidatesThis is a draft
This page contains a list of the Arbiter Candidates. For additional details concerning the job description of the Arbiters please refer to the Telephone Sanitizer's page.
If you would like to vote for one please send an e-mail to (... which states the name of the candidate you would like to vote for)/(post the following form at the appropriate thread), you can vote for more than one candidate.
The Candidates are
X - U2
Y - U3
Please use this form for voting and answer all questions:
I would like to give my vote for Arbiter Candidate [Name, User ID]
Has the Candidate a demonstrated ability to remain impartial and objective, and can be neither easily intimidated nor flattered?
Has the Candidate earned the respect of the research community?
Has the Candidate a proven ability to make up hir mind when presented with conflicting facts, and the ability to change that mind should new information come to be presented?
Has the Candidate the common good of the community as a clearly demonstrated priority, and acts in the interests of the community to find peaceful resolution of interpersonal conflicts?
Has the candidate displayed any behaviour which would disqualify hir from the position? (Examples are arbitrary behavior, seeking out disputes in order to resolve them, interpreting the House Rules in any way that can be construed as altering the original or legal intent, or acting as the fawning lapdog of a decadent bureaucracy)
Therefore my vote for the candidate is [YES / NO].
Thank you for participating in the vote ansd showing an active interest in H2G2.