Æthelred II - The Unready

1 Conversation

Æthelred1 II was King of England from 978-1016, and is known as Æthelred the Unready. His reign was not a success - in 1014 he was forced to flee England for a year, and on his death in 1016, England had been conquered by the Danish leader Cnut2.

The Start of Æthelred II's Reign

In 975, King Edgar of England died. Edgar had ruled England since 959 after the death of his brother Eadwig, and his reign was considered a "Golden Age" in Anglo-Saxon England. On his death, his first son Edward, later known as Edward the Martyr, took the crown. Edward was Æthelred's half-brother.

In 978, Edward visited his brother Æthelred and Æthelred's mother Ælfthryth, Edward's step-mother, at their home in Corfe. Whilst there, he was murdered, presumably by Ælfthryth, and Æthelred became king at the age of about 10. Edward's body was left until 980 before given a proper burial. His murder and lack of proper action by Æthelred to either bury or avenge his death meant that Æthelred II was, from the start of his reign, an unpopular king. When Edward was finally burried in 980 at Shaftesbury, miracles were considered to have happened near to his grave, which led to the adoption of his title "the Martyr".

Æthelred II also was given a title "The Unræd". The name "Æthelred" is constructed from "Æthel" meaning "Noble" and "Ræd" meaning "counsel". The title "The Unræd" was a play on his name's meaning, calling Æthelred "Without good advice". This title has, over the years, been corrupted into "The Unready".

Æthelred the Unready's reign of England was not as successful as his father Edgar's. It ended with the conquest of England by Swein and Cnut. From 980 AD onwards, until his Æthelred's death in April 1016, Viking raids attacked England more and more frequently, and finally in 1016 Cnut was declared king of all England. The reason why the Vikings initially raided England was because England was a wealthy country, and profitable to raid. The Danegeld tribute was being increasingly paid; money which could have, perhaps, been paid to mercenaries to fight against the invaders, or, more profitably, in building an English armed force capable of defeating the invaders. Mercenaries and other Vikings were used to try and protect the English kingdom, such as Thorkell in 1012, and Olaf Tryggvason, who promised to defend England from further raids after his conversion to Christianity in 994. Mercenaries and Viking allies, however, created their own problems, such as the risk of being betrayed by them. A better option was increasing the effectiveness of England's armed forces.

Could England Have Been Stronger?

There is evidence to suggest that England could have been a much stronger power and created a much stronger resistance than they in fact did. In 1008, Æthelred started work on building a navy, it's ships are described as being "more of them than had ever been in England in the days of any king" . This not only suggests that Æthelred's kingdom was potentially stronger than before, and therefore unlikely to be easily conquered, but could have been an effective force against the Viking invaders. Yet this fleet proved to be ineffective. In this case, as in many others, those in positions to prevent the Viking invaders from doing harm turn traitor, and in 1009 Prince Wulfnoth, commander of many of the ships, turned pirate and fled, resulting in the eventual loss of the entire fleet.

Æthelred did take action in response to the Viking invaders, yet what he did do was ineffective. In 1000, Æthelred campaigned against Strathclyde and the Isle of Man. Æthelred must have felt secure enough to be able to mobilise an army away from England's exposed North Sea and Channel coasts in order to do this, yet this army was not fully used against the Viking invaders. That it could have been can be seen by the events of 1014, when, after Swein's death, Æthelred returned to England from exile and, with an army, forced Cnut out of England.

After Æthelred's death, and after nearly 36 years of raiding in which time England's wealth and ability to defend itself, weakened by the raids, there is evidence that suggests that England could have been a lot stronger. Edmund Ironsides, Æthelred's son, openly fought the Viking forces of Cnut effectively for the first time. The result at the battle of Ashingdon was a victory for Cnut against Edmund Ironsides, yet Edmund Ironsides maintained the freedom of the Kingdom of Wessex for the period of his reign, even though it proved to be only for a year. Despite the defeat at Ashingdon, Edmund's actions showed that England was capable of raising an army opposed to the Viking invaders.

Only twice, in 992 and 1009 had large armies been gathered under Æthelred, at all other times the response to the Viking threat was on a local level. These local raids often resulted in the loss of brave men such as Byrhtnoth, ealdorman of Essex. Those who were more willing to fight often fought with only local men and were defeated. As it was the men more willing to fight who were more likely to have died, when a stronger attempt to face the Viking invaders was organised, it was too late and England had been too weakened. If a national response had been organised sooner, before the Viking forces had weakened England, and more effectively, it is possible that Æthelred's kingdom would not have been conquered, or at least, not as easily conquered.

What advice did Æthelred Have?

The main weakness in Æthelred's reign was his lack of good counsel. This was apparent even to medieval historians, who named Æthelred the "Unread", meaning without good advice. The lack of good advice can be directly linked with a lack of experienced and wise advisors of any kind. When Æthelred came to the throne in 978, he was a child of around 10, with his main advisor in his first years being his mother. In the 980s and 990s, many of his advisors, experienced men who had experience from the reign of Edgar himself, died, including Dunstan. Æthelred replaced many of these men by men who would later prove to be traitors, such as Ealdorman Leofsige, who in 1002 killed Æfic, the King's high-reeve, and those who were not, such as Æthelgar who succeeded Dunstan, died within a very short time. Other men who would have proved invaluable in organising a national response to the Viking threat died early too, such as Byrhtnoth in 991.

There was a very strong feeling of instability during his reign. A lot of this can be shown to have originated before Æthelred's reign, during the reign of Æthelred's half-brother Edward the Martyr. During Edgar's reign, a lot of land that the church had lost to many noble landowners was returned to the church. After Edgar's death in 975 there were a number of attacks on church property and the Archbishops in the north of England resented being, in effect, ruled by the south. This trend continued in Æthelred's reign, but did not originate in it. Edward was not, during his reign, a popular king, yet his death in Corfe also perpetuated the atmosphere of instability. As Edward's death was not avenged, nor was he given a proper funeral until 980, it seemed that England was undergoing a period of instability quite unlike the "Golden Age" experienced during Edgar's reign. The population at this time were very superstitious - Edward the Martyr's title "The Martyr" itself was due to "miracles" that occurred around the area where his body lay. This meant that people were perhaps more likely to question Æthelred's right to lead. What is certain is that many people betrayed Æthelred's decisions at one stage or another, including even his son Edmund who defied Æthelred by marrying Sigeforth's widow and taking possession of the Danelaw. In fact, after Æthelred had fled to the Isle of Wight and Normandy after Swein's invasion in 1013 and his subsequent death in 1014, Æthelred was only allowed to resume being king on certain conditions negotiated by the nobles of England and Æthelred's son Edward . This suggests that there was a strong feeling of instability and division within Æthelred's kingdom, and as a result of this division, Æthelred's kingdom was more easily conquered.

The period of instability and division continued even when the Viking raids became more serious. In 1002, Æthelweard, ealdorman of Southwest England, died, yet the title of Ealdorman was not passed on, the area being ruled by shire-reeves alone. Æthelweard's son Æthelmaer, who would have been expected to inherit the title, later defected to Swein with considerable force. Other men in powerful positions were exiled, such as Ælfric of Mercia, Leofsige of Essex and Wulfgeat. By weakening and removing the power of those around him, Æthelred effectively removed many of those with power possibly capable of acting against the Viking invaders. Æthelred's willingness to exile, and even in the cases of Ælfhelm, Sigeforth and Morcar, put to death people he considered traitors may well explain why Wulfnoth was more willing to turn pirate and desert his king than to try and defend himself against accusations of treachery. This treatment of men in power could not fail to weaken Æthelred's kingdom, and this was a powerful contribution to why Æthelred's kingdom was so easily conquered.

How Loyal were Æthelred's Followers?

Æthelred's kingdom was more easily conquered because of traitors such as Wulfnoth, Ælfric Ealdorman of East Wessex and, perhaps more significantly Eadric, Ealdorman of Mercia. Yet it is important to try and understand why these people became traitors. One thing considered to be one of the king's duties at this time was to reward loyalty with grants of land and titles. In many cases, Æthelred failed to do this. He also failed to negotiate and smooth rivalries over. In 1015, Eadric betrayed Æthelred and Edmund. The Anglo-Saxon chronicles describes this as

"The king then lay sick… Then Ealdorman Eadric gathered an army… when they came together, the ealdorman [Eadric] wanted to betray the ætheling [Edmund]... and then Ealdorman Eadric enticed 40 ships from the king, and then submitted to Cnut."

One possible reason for Eadric's betrayal is due to a private feud between Eadric and Edmund. In 1015 Sigeforth and Morcar, thegns of the Seven Boroughs , and possibly a threat to Eadric's power as ealdorman of Mercia, were betrayed by Eadric and killed. Then when Edmund then married Sigeforth's widow and took control of the Seven Boroughs, it seems likely that Eadric considered Edmund's actions to be a challenge against his own position. Eadric does not betray Æthelred until he is ill, and at Æthelred's age, this illness is likely to result in death. Edmund would be the most likely to inherit the throne, as indeed he later does after Æthelred's death in 1016, and it is likely that Edmund would either exile or possibly even execute Eadric for his actions regarding Sigeforth and Morcar. It seems that it was therefore in Eadric's best self-interest at this time to submit to Cnut, yet this rivalry between Edmund and Eadric, both men in great positions of power, weakened England so that Æthelred's kingdom was more easily conquered.

Æthelred did, however, manage to solve some problems effectively during his reign. In the late 980s the Viking raiders were sheltered and aided by Normandy. This led to hostilities between England and Normandy, to the extent that even Pope John XV tried to bring peace between the two in a treaty in December 990. This problem was eventually solved by Æthelred's marriage to Emma, the Count of Normandy's daughter. Yet despite this, he was not able to effectively maintain the loyalty or prevent feuding amongst his own nobility. His actions in planning the St. Brice's Day Massacre in1002 did nothing to encourage loyalty amongst local Danes in England.

The Vikings

Were the Viking invaders remarkably strong during this period? This question is very simplistic, as the Viking Raids begin in the 980s, and end with the conquest of England in 1016. Although there was royal support for the raids on England, with the combined force of Norway and Denmark, the Viking forces were not united. Many Vikings fought for Æthelred and England, such as Thorkell. Æthelred's reign lasted for 38 years, in which time there were three kings of Denmark - Harold Gormsson, Swein and Cnut. Harold Gormsson had been able to unite Denmark and Norway, yet Swein, his son deposed him in 988; Harold was unpopular for imposing state Christianity. Swein became king of both Denmark and Norway. Olaf Tryggvason reconquered Norway in the 990s, yet within ten years had been recovered by Swein. On Swein's death in 1014, his Empire was divided with his son Harold proclaimed king of Denmark, Cnut king of England. It was a period in which the Vikings were beginning to become more organised and strong. The raids started in the 980s when the influx of Islamic silver had ended, and another source of income was needed, yet only became attempts to conquer England itself in the early 11th Century. This could be due to the possibility that Swein's sister had been killed in the St. Brice's Day Massacre in 1002 and he desired revenge. In 1013 Swein was declared king of Northumbria and Æthelred had fled Britain. Later, after Swein's death in 1014, Cnut returned to England with the support of his brother Harold of Denmark. The raids on England did have royal support, and it is likely that Harold considered it wise to help Cnut's ambitions regarding England rather than risk Cnut turning his attentions to the throne of Denmark. The Viking invaders, therefore, were stronger, but more importantly better organised, than they had been before.

Overall, Æthelred's kingdom was so easily conquered because Æthelred was a poor king who did not do all that he could have to encourage loyalty amongst his men, and this weakness was exploited by the Viking invaders under the strong leadership of Swein and Cnut.

1There are many different spellings of Æthelred, including Ethelred and Æthelræd2Also called Canute

Bookmark on your Personal Space



Infinite Improbability Drive

Infinite Improbability Drive

Read a random Edited Entry

Written by

Edited by

h2g2 Editors


h2g2 is created by h2g2's users, who are members of the public. The views expressed are theirs and unless specifically stated are not those of the Not Panicking Ltd. Unlike Edited Entries, Entries have not been checked by an Editor. If you consider any Entry to be in breach of the site's House Rules, please register a complaint. For any other comments, please visit the Feedback page.

Write an Entry

"The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is a wholly remarkable book. It has been compiled and recompiled many times and under many different editorships. It contains contributions from countless numbers of travellers and researchers."

Write an entry
Read more