A Conversation for Burke and Hare - the Bodysnatchers
I'm going to be pedantic...
Researcher 168963 Started conversation Mar 8, 2002
...and ask that the title is changed back to 'Burke and Hare - The Bodysnatchers' from 'Burke and Hare - Bodysnatchers'. The definite article in there is actually quite important.
Is this possible?
Thankyou.
I'm going to be pedantic...
Researcher 168963 Posted Mar 25, 2002
Don't bother listening to me then. I'm only the author after all. A simple 'no, sorry' would have sufficed.
Will you at least change the caption on the picture because, as is stated in the article, *Burke and Hare were NOT graverobbers, they were murderers*.
I'm going to be pedantic...
Researcher 168963 Posted Mar 25, 2002
Having just read this on the front page:
#Editor's Selection for Monday: Also known as 'resurrectionists', bodysnatchers Burke and Hare had a grim occupation and no mistake. Read on to discover more about these two legendary grave robbers... #
My stress level is now somewhere between pissed off and downright angry. The whole point of the entry was to dispell the myth that they were graverobbers by offering the real facts. I put a lot of work into that, admittedly while I was procrastinating on a physics paper, but that's not the point.
You could at least have read the entry before commenting
Well I ended up with impression they were murderers...
vogonpoet (AViators at A13264670) Posted Mar 26, 2002
I can see why you're pretty p****d off... if its any consolation, the error on the front page failed to leave me with the impression that Burke and Hare were grave robbers, after I had read your excellent article - What I am trying to say is the message that they were murderers not thieves is clear to the reader, or me at least ...
*wonders if and when any editor types are going to notice this thread*
Well I ended up with impression they were murderers...
Sam Posted Mar 26, 2002
Right, sorry it's taken me a while to get to this thread - we've been very busy and it's absolutely impossible for us Eds to be subscribed to every page we edit! (In future, if you want to get my attention a little quicker, leave a message on my Personal Space which I do periodically check throughout the day.) Anyway, I am sorry that you're p****d off and that you had to wait this long.
I've changed the picture ALT text to read 'Burke and Hare' (I've omitted the bit about them robbing a grave) and I've changed the title to read 'Burke and Hare - the Bodysnatchers'.
The reason that I mentioned them robbing graves in the first place was because that's what they did (and it says so in your entry!). They might have been murderers too, but they were certainly into digging up the odd grave; they formed just part of a wider nocturnal group which you rightly allude to in your fine entry when you used the term, 'ressurectionists'.
Sam.
Well I ended up with impression they were murderers...
Researcher 168963 Posted Mar 26, 2002
Thankyou
Although...the bit about graverobbing was about graverobbers in general, explaning how and why the trade got harder, and why Burke and Hare chose a different approach. The entry also says that Burke denied they ever robbed graves when he confessed to the murders.
Anyway, I do at least know how to get someone's attention now - swear. I shall bear that in mind in future
Well I ended up with impression they were murderers...
vogonpoet (AViators at A13264670) Posted Mar 26, 2002
Well I ended up with impression they were murderers...
Demon Drawer Posted Mar 26, 2002
There is an excellent bit about these guys in the Edinburgh Dungeon. And that makes it very clear that they did carry out murder to get fresh corpses, though they did on occasions rob graves as well if murder was just not possible.
Well I ended up with impression they were murderers...
vogonpoet (AViators at A13264670) Posted Mar 26, 2002
That must have been tough - there they were, respectable murderers, either having to occasionally drop down to the level of common thieves, or be percieved as having dropped down to the level of common thieves.
WHo'd be a murderer eh?
Key: Complain about this post
I'm going to be pedantic...
- 1: Researcher 168963 (Mar 8, 2002)
- 2: Researcher 168963 (Mar 25, 2002)
- 3: Researcher 168963 (Mar 25, 2002)
- 4: vogonpoet (AViators at A13264670) (Mar 26, 2002)
- 5: Sam (Mar 26, 2002)
- 6: Researcher 168963 (Mar 26, 2002)
- 7: vogonpoet (AViators at A13264670) (Mar 26, 2002)
- 8: Sam (Mar 26, 2002)
- 9: Demon Drawer (Mar 26, 2002)
- 10: vogonpoet (AViators at A13264670) (Mar 26, 2002)
- 11: Demon Drawer (Mar 26, 2002)
More Conversations for Burke and Hare - the Bodysnatchers
Write an Entry
"The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is a wholly remarkable book. It has been compiled and recompiled many times and under many different editorships. It contains contributions from countless numbers of travellers and researchers."