A Conversation for The Freedom to Insult Politicians: Eugene V Debs and the Sedition Act

Peer Review: A87832650 - The Freedom to Insult Politicians: Eugene V Debs and the Sedition Act

Post 1

Dmitri Gheorgheni, Post Editor

Entry: The Freedom to Insult Politicians: Eugene V Debs and the Sedition Act - A87832650
Author: Dmitri Gheorgheni - U1590784

I decided that what PR needed was more Eugene V Debs. He was one of the coolest people hte US ever had the privilege of producing.

Besdides, this will help all you US history students pass your exams...

DG


A87832650 - The Freedom to Insult Politicians: Eugene V Debs and the Sedition Act

Post 2

Nosebagbadger {Ace}

A very interesting entry - did nobody challenge it (even if unsuccessfully) under the 1st amendment?


A87832650 - The Freedom to Insult Politicians: Eugene V Debs and the Sedition Act

Post 3

Bluebottle

A very good article. I was a bit confused initially after misreading 'Eugene V Debs' I had expected to read a court case between someone called Eugene and someone else called Debs, but I should have noticed that capital Vsmiley - doh

<BB<


A87832650 - The Freedom to Insult Politicians: Eugene V Debs and the Sedition Act

Post 4

Dmitri Gheorgheni, Post Editor

smiley - rofl Aha, like 'Kramer v Kramer'? We always call him 'Eugene V Debs', I dunno why...

Actually, that's a great question about the challenge. It's just that the explanation is monstrously long.

The challenge was issued by Eugene V Debs' fellow-SOcialist, Charles Schenck. Schenck mailed out 15,000 pamphlets to draftees, telling them that conscription violated the 13th Amendment - the prohibition against 'involuntary servitude' - in his humble opinion.

Schenck was arrested. He appealed to the Supreme Court, on the grounds that the Espionage Act of 1917 - the law he was arrested under - violated the 1st Amendment.

The Supreme Court upheld the law - which caused no end of trouble.

1. Schenck v United States was a landmark decision.
\
2. The opinion included the fateful analogy of 'shouting Fire! in a crowded theatre'.

3. It wasn't amended until 1969. I believe the issues then was the entagon Papers.

You see why I didn't want to get into it.

But yes - very big deal.


A87832650 - The Freedom to Insult Politicians: Eugene V Debs and the Sedition Act

Post 5

Nosebagbadger {Ace}

See now i'm interested - has a case about conscription and the 13th amendment ever made it to the supreme court?


A87832650 - The Freedom to Insult Politicians: Eugene V Debs and the Sedition Act

Post 6

Dmitri Gheorgheni, Post Editor

No - they stopped that time bomb at the 1st Amendment. smiley - rofl

At least, not that I'm aware of.

By the way, Schenck only got six months for the pamphlet.

Here's a copy, if you're curious:

http://www.english.illinois.edu/-people-/faculty/debaron/380/380reading/schenckpamphlet.html


Congratulations - Your Entry has been Recommended for the Edited Guide!

Post 7

h2g2 auto-messages

Your Guide Entry has just been picked from Peer Review by one of our Scouts, and is now heading off into the Editorial Process, which ends with publication in the Edited Guide. We've moved this Review Conversation out of Peer Review and to the entry itself.

If you'd like to know what happens now, check out the page on 'What Happens after your Entry has been Recommended?' at EditedGuide-Process. We hope this explains everything.

Thanks for contributing to the Edited Guide!


Congratulations - Your Entry has been Recommended for the Edited Guide!

Post 8

Bluebottle

smiley - applauseCongratulations - I look forward to this being on the front page!

<BB<


Key: Complain about this post

More Conversations for The Freedom to Insult Politicians: Eugene V Debs and the Sedition Act

Write an Entry

"The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is a wholly remarkable book. It has been compiled and recompiled many times and under many different editorships. It contains contributions from countless numbers of travellers and researchers."

Write an entry
Read more