Welcome to this Researcher's Journal. If you'd like to comment on anything they have written here, just click the relevant 'Discuss this Entry' button.

Anti-Semitism
Nov 25, 2002

Uncle Nick looks at Anti-Semitism.

I was today (23/11/02) accused of being anti-semitic for drawing a parallel between the Warsaw Ghetto and other ‘Actions’ as they were termed, that the SS took against Jewish communities, and the actions of the State of Israel against the Palestinians.

Two things surprised me at this accusation, 1. That my accusers had never heard of Sabra and Shatila. And 2. That despite being clever and educated free thinking individuals my collegues did not know what a ‘Semite’ was.

So now I’ve had a kip I’m going to look into the whole Israel Palestine thing.

The time now is 18:00hrs.

NOTES:

http://www.hyperdictionary.com/dictionary/Semitic


Semitic
2 entries found.

From Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary (1913) [web1913]

Semitic \Sem*it"ic\, a.
Of or pertaining to Shem or his descendants; belonging to that division of the Caucasian race which includes the Arabs, Jews, and related races. [Written also {Shemitic}.]

{Semitic language}, a name used to designate a group of Asiatic and African languages some living and some dead, namely: Hebrew and Ph[oe]nician, Aramaic, Assyrian, Arabic, Ethiopic (Geez and Ampharic). --Encyc. Brit.

From WordNet (r) 1.6 [wn]

Semitic
adj 1: of or relating to the group of Semitic languages; "Semitic tongues have a complicated morphology" [syn: {Semitic}]
2: of or relating to or characteristic of Semites; "Semite peoples" [syn: {Semite}, {Semitic}]
n : a major branch of the Afro-Asiatic language family [syn: {Semitic}]


http://members.aol.com/chaldeans7/history/ancient_chronology.html

Ancient Chronology

The term Semite was first introduced in 1781 by the German historian Schleozer to include all speakers of languages belonging to the Semitic family. These ancient languages include Arabic, Hebrew, Aramaic (Chaldean, Babylonian, and Assyrian), and Canaanian. Schloezer reasoned that the speakers of these languages were all descendants of Noah's son, Sam, and therefore "Semites". Because of the remarkable similarities of the Semitic languages, the term Semitic began to be applied to the speakers of these languages. The modern view tends to ascribe the term Semitic more to linguistic characteristics than to racial origins.

There is no clear-cut evidence that can pinpoint the origins of the speakers of the Semitic languages. The most acceptable theory is that the ancient desert dwellers of present-day Saudi Arabia and the Arabian Peninsula turned eastward to escape the harsh weather conditions and settled in a fertile region south of present-day Baghdad. The date of these initial migrations is estimated to be around 8000 B.C.


http://menj.tripod.com/Pejuang_Bangsa/semitism.htm

The Term "Anti-Semitism" And Its Misuse

This article was written to study the term "anti-Semitism" and its usage, prompted after the author came across a pro-Zionist American-Jewish website commenting on the Palestinian Authority's so-called "anti-Semitism". The term has been seriously misused by the Zionists for their own end, so much so that those who "dare to speak out" against such vulgarity are rebuffed by the same media who is quick to unleash the ever successful strategy of Anti Semitism, a deceptive tactic that is meant to defer the world's attention from the ethnic cleansing of Palestinians, and the murderous campaign launched against them. But what we would really need to know is what the connotation of "Semitic" really are, and who is really the "anti-Semite"?

The Compton's Interactive Encyclopedia (1995) defines "Semitic" as:

Se mit ic (s mit ik) adj. [[Ger semitisch < ModL Semiticus < Semita : see prec.]] designating or of the Semites or their languages or cultures n. a major subfamily of the Afroasiatic family of languages, usually divided into eastern (Akkadian), northwestern (Canaanite, Aramaic, Hebrew, etc.), central (Arabic), and southwestern (South Arabic, Ethiopic) branches.

By the above definition of "Semitic", a "Semite" would be a person hailing from one of the following Semitic branches; Assyrian, Babylonian, Phoenician, Canaanite, Jew, Arab, Ethiopian, etc.

Now let us refer to the definition of "anti" (Ibid) as follows:
an ti (an ti , -te) n. , pl. -tis [[< fol., in various compounds]] [Colloq.] a person opposed to some policy, proposal, action, etc. prep. [Colloq.] opposed to; against

In short, when we form the word "anti-Semitic", it would actually mean "a person opposed to those hailing from Semitic roots, such as an Assyrian, a Canaanite, a Jew, an Arab, an Ethiopian, etc." Now we can already see the actual meaning of the term, so where does it signify anywhere in its original connotations that an "anti-Semite" is a person who hates or is against the Jews?

It is therefore a common sense definition that an "anti-Semite", whether man or monster, is one who without exception hates all the Semitic races.

http://www.us-israel.org/jsource/anti-semitism/pastatements.html

"There is a need to formulate a clear information plan... In order for us to oppose the Zionist media, which dominates more than half of the media in the world - newspapers, radio and television."
--- from a program on the official PA television station about the media, December 3, 1997



Whats a Zionist?

http://www.varsity.utoronto.ca/arch...ves/118/mar02/opinions/zionism.html

Zionism, as an official movement, developed in Europe in the late 19th century, though the sentiments on which it drew were in existence for centuries. At its origins there were two distinct streams of Zionist thought: Cultural and Political Zionism. Cultural Zionism focussed on the creation of a spiritual centre for the scattered Jewish people. Cultural Zionists believed that the importance of Judaism in the lives of the Jewish people was rapidly diminishing and that its only hope of renewal was some common cultural focus would be located in the land historically associated with the Jews — Zion. There was a need for a distinctive culture based on the Hebrew language that could unite the Jews scattered throughout the world, no matter what language they spoke.

Like so many nationalistic movements of the 19th century, Political Zionism was a product of the political climate of its times. There were many different types of Jewish communities scattered throughout Europe, and some were more integrated into the surrounding population than others. All were exposed to anti-Semitism in some form or another. This anti-Semitism manifested itself in widespread pogroms (violent, government-sanctioned attacks on Jews and Jewish property) in Eastern Europe, the dissemination of hate-literature throughout the popular press in Western Europe, and the scapegoating of Jews during difficult times throughout Europe. It was in this environment that Theodor Herzl, whose name is most commonly associated with the foundation of Political Zionism, formulated the notion of a need for a national homeland for the Jewish people./

Like so many nationalistic movements of the 19th century, Political Zionism was a product of the political climate of its times. There were many different types of Jewish communities scattered throughout Europe, and some were more integrated into the surrounding population than others. All were exposed to anti-Semitism in some form or another. This anti-Semitism manifested itself in widespread pogroms (violent, government-sanctioned attacks on Jews and Jewish property) in Eastern Europe, the dissemination of hate-literature throughout the popular press in Western Europe, and the scapegoating of Jews during difficult times throughout Europe. It was in this environment that Theodor Herzl, whose name is most commonly associated with the foundation of Political Zionism, formulated the notion of a need for a national homeland for the Jewish people.

Herzl believed that a national and autonomous homeland would benefit both Jews and non-Jews by protecting the Jews from anti-Semitism and removing the Jewish presence in European countries. Only an internationally recognized political state would achieve these aims. Though Herzl considered other geographic alternatives to Palestine, he felt that the only way to unify the disparate elements of Europe's various Jewish communities was by invoking the existing biblical tradition that associates the Jews with Zion. Herzl's efforts led to the First Zionist Congress in 1897, at which he gathered delegates from all over the world to discuss the future of the Zionist movement./

http://www.geocities.com/Vienna/6640/zion/judenstaadt.html
(The Jewish State Theodor Herzl 1896)



http://www.angelfire.com/il2/borochov/




So WHY HAS Anti-Semite come to mean Anti-Jewish?

Because the only Semitic group that existed in significant numbers in Europe were the Jews.

Blamed by the Catholic Church for killing the baby Jesus at Christmas (or something) and also, for a long time, because the Catholic Church forbade Ursury, the only people allowed to charge interest on loans. Culturally different, often succesfull (The corner shop phenomenon!!) they were the best scapegoat in town.

Jewish culture emphisised the strength of the “Family / Tribe” at a time when Europes industrialists were starting to think of “Individuals” as “Productive Units”

Now we have lots of non-white, non-christian groups within Europe to scapegoat when our “democratically” elected political elite wants to shove it to the “masses”

Racism is a Political Tool, based on the instinctive fear inherent in all animals to protect against incursions from a different Tribe or pack. That natural emotion is built upon via the media to create a barrier between people within the same geographical location. It stops us finding common cause and common interest in our own local communities, despite cultural differences between neighbours. It prevents the ‘synergy’ that occurs when people come together peacefully and share ideas and work towards a common good. It means that instead of scrutinising the methods and motives of the ‘Authorities’ we shun those who’s lives are so miserable in their own countries that they risk death and worse to reach our shores, we throw bricks through our neighbours windows, destroy our own communities instead of pooling our resources, human and material, to build a future for all of our children and our grand children, for all the human race.


http://www.suite101.com/article.cfm/jewish_american_history/34831


(22:30/23/11) Just reading this :-
http://www.federalobserver.com/archive.php?aid=2390

(22:44/23/11) I’ve got to 1933, been holding my breath since :-

1919: 31st October, 14 Years before Adolf Hitler is elected to Chancellor the Former Governor of New York Mr Martin Glynn writes an article in THE AMERICAN HEBREW MAGAZINE claiming 6 million Jewish men, women & children are dying in a Holocaust in Europe. The whole article is total fiction .

verify that article.

1936: More than 100 Jewish-American firms still operate in Germany, amongst them, Warburg Bank, Kuhn-Loeb Bank, Rothschild Bank, Du-Pont, Standard Oil, Coca Cola, General Motors (GM is 100% owned by JP Morgan and they owned 100% of Opel and built all German Tanks), and Rockefeller Vacuum Oil. IG. Farben (Zyklon B) was 50% owned by US Standard Oil. After the war, many German managers of these firms were executed as 'war-criminals' none of the American owners were called to Justice.

Yes, without a doubt. Although till now I had only thought of the Warburgs as being 1. A Jewish firm and 2. Complicit in the Holocaust.

(23:22/23/11) Have finished reading the article, in general, albeit that most of the information is new to me and I would like to see some further verification of certain points, there is no denial and it generally concurs with the results of my own research in so far as it touches upon the period. I held my breath because I was expecting some form of holocaust denial, instead it would appear that the articles authors are a Jewish group.

The Original article is here:-

http://www.vegan.swinternet.co.uk/mainpages/about_frame.html

(Some interesting info on vaccines on the above site)


The following from a 1938 Jewish Student pamphlet seems to support the above

http://www.arts.uwo.ca/chomsky/mit/avukahpamphlet.html


What do American Jews need?

ON THE FIRST FRONT, their position in America, the Jews require eventual liberation from the difficulties arising out of their minority position. This implies an amelioration of the effects of antisemitism, job discrimination, social exclusion and the like, and the attainment of actual equality and freedom of opportunity. But the effort of the Jewish group alone cannot effect such improvement. It is dependent upon the type of society in America; the more progressive society becomes, the greater the liberation of minorities. Therefore the Jews as a group need a democratic society protecting individual liberties, and a progressive social order. Above all, their interests conflict with Fascism, for a totalitarian regime would completely crush them. True that the economic interests of some Jewish industrialists and financiers outweigh their special needs as Jews. But these men hardly represent the broad masses of American Jews.

From the same organization in 1942 –

Standard Oil and Russia

It can now scarcely be doubted that economic and political opposition has led to sabotage of aid to Russia from the U. S. I. F. Stone has charged in recent articles in P.M. and The Nation that! despite direct orders from the President issued fourteen months ago, Russian requests for aviation gasoline plants have been held up by officials in the State Department, the War Production Board, and the Petroleum Coordinator's Office. Standard Oil men in these departments told Stone that they feared Russia was asking for the plants in order to get technical secrets which would enable it to compete with the U. S. after the war (Germany already knows of these because of Standard's patent-pooling agreement with I. G. Farben).


The aviation gasoline plants – If I am not mistaken this would refer to methanol and / or Ethyl lead additive production (Germany had no Oil) and the patents were for a large part involved with the utilisation of Coal Tar, hydrocarbon that Germany had lots of. It’s the reason they were building Auswich.


Du Ponts Annual Report for 1937 www.unclenicks.net/canvas

“With respect to Taxation.....the future is clouded not only as to the amount of future imposts, but also to the extent to which the Revenue Raising power of Government can be converted into an Instrument for forcing acceptance of sudden new ideas of Industrial and social reorganisation”

www.unclenicks.net/research

"Without I.G.'s immense productive facilities, its far-reaching research, varied technical experience and overall concentration of economic power, Germany would not have been in the position to start its aggressive war in September 1939." 1 Such was the judgment rendered by a team of civilian and military experts assigned by General Eisenhower at the close of World War II to make an exhaustive investigation of I.G.'s contribution to the Nazi war effort. Extravagant as this conclusion may have sounded, the record sustains its accuracy.

I.G. truly was a mighty industrial colossus. So huge were its assets admitted and concealed, so superior its technological know-how, and so formidable its array of patents that it dominated the chemical business of the world. I.G. fortified its commercial leadership by constructing a maze of cartels whose members included such industrial giants as Kuhlmann of France, Imperial Chemical Industries of Great Britain, Montecatini of Italy, Aussiger Verein of Czechoslovakia, Boruta of Poland, Mitsui of Japan and Standard Oil (New Jersey), Du Pont, and Dow Chemical of the United States.


17:25/23/11 having gone away for a bit, and let last nights information intake settle in a bit, my preliminary thoughts are –

In the late 19th and early 20th century there was a coming together, an amalgamation of common interest, between very, very rich people. Bankers and Industrialist’ in Britain Europe, America and Russia. Some of these happened to be Jewish.

These Bankers and Industrialists realised that by pooling their resources and utilizing new technology, they would be able to ‘Rule the World for a Thousand Years’.

Q. How long does it take to build a Thousand Year Reich?

The manipulation of the markets by the Banks brought financial chaos to the target country, in the early days Zionism and Socialism were one and the same. Those Bankers who happened to be Jewish, USED the poor Jews of the diaspora to instigate International Terrorism on behalf of the wider Cartel. The same way that ‘former’ CIA agent Osama Bin Laden is using the Moslem communities to further the aims of the Carlyle Group.

The First World War was the first ‘success’ for this convergence of Capital and Industry. The increased demand for Oil, Steel and Chemicals, as well as loans to the Governments of the Nations involved , with all that lovely money in the Bank they just couldn’t wait to do it again.

The Zionists were rewarded for there role in hastening the downfall of Germany (by dragging America into it and formenting social unrest and occasioning acts of sabotage inGermany) with the “Balfour Decleration”

The notion of getting the Semitics back to where they belong was only common sense to the Bankers and Industrialists who concurred with the Malthusian / Eugenics view of Race and Human Development as well as adopting ‘The Furer Principle’ in Business.

People such as Ireene Du Pont, Henry Ford, Carl Duisberg, Prescot Bush (Oh yes!!)

The cultural idea of ‘Zion’ as a place to return to when the Jews were ‘Ready’ was translated into the political ideal of ‘Zion’ as a place to escape the suffering imposed upon them by the goyim.

In Palestine, what was left of the Ottoman Empire was gradually starting to pull together . The influx of cash and new ideas into Palestine had predictably beneficial effects for the whole population. The Middle East was gradually reforming. There was every reason for the ‘People of the Book’ to live together in Peace.

Problem was the British during the Mandate, promised everything to everyone and ended up giving nothing to no one.

http://encarta.msn.com/encnet/refpages/RefArticle.aspx?refid=761558705

The rise of European nationalism in the 19th century, and especially the intensification of anti-Semitism during the 1880s, encouraged European Jews to seek haven in their “promised land,” Palestine. Theodor Herzl, author of The Jewish State (1896; translated 1896), founded the World Zionist Organization in 1897 to solve Europe’s “Jewish problem” (see Zionism). As a result, Jewish immigration to Palestine greatly increased/

Between the Wars, as social conditions in Russia and Europe worsened, the ‘masses’ started looking around for someone to blame for their plight. Because the Bankers and Industrialists had used Jewish personnel and Jewish community networks to effect their policy of ‘Wars for Profit’ Jews everywhere were held as scapegoats.

This forced migration led to the destabilising of the whole Middle East.

Warring Tribes can be paid in Guns for the right to steal their wealth.

Jewish business acumen and experience of the ‘Civilised World’ should have led the region to prosperity. *Cordoba* Instead, it kept the Middle East Oil field’s largely off stream and thus not competing with Rockerfella’s Standard Oil cartel. The Brits weren’t too bothered cos we had coal.

Meanwhile. Back in the Board Room :-

http://www.unclenicks.net/research/CIA-Gestapo/Elkhorn2/elkhorn2.html

U.S. CORPORATIONS AND THE NAZIS

"A clique of U.S. industrialists is hell-bent to bring a fascist state to supplant our democratic government and is working closely with the fascist regime in Germany and Italy. I have had plenty of opportunity in my post in Berlin to witness how close some of our American ruling families are to the Nazi regime. . . .

"Certain American industrialists had a great deal to do with bringing fascist regimes into being in both Germany and Italy. They extended aid to help Fascism occupy the seat of power, and they are helping to keep it there." - William E. Dodd, U.S. Ambassador to Germany, 1937.


The Marajuana Tax Act of 1937 nicely dealt with the only Carbohydrate alternative to the ‘Vision’ of a ‘Reich’ founded on Hydrocarbons and Pharmacueticals.

And lay the way open for the previously mentioned “Social and Industrial Re-organisation” as envisaged by such people as :-

http://www.unclenicks.net/research/CIA-Gestapo/Elkhorn2/elkhorn2.html


Irenee du Pont, "the most imposing and powerful member of the clan," according to biographer and historian Charles Higham, "was obsessed with Hitler's principles." "He keenly followed the career of the future Fuhrer in the 1920s, and on September 7, 1926, in a speech to the American Chemical Society, he advocated a race of supermen, to be achieved by injecting special drugs into them in boyhood to make their characters to order." Higham's book on this subject, "Trading with the Enemy: An Expose of the Nazi-American Money Plot 1933-1949," is highly recommended./

". . . In 1929, [Du Pont-controlled] GM acquired the largest automobile company in Germany, Adam Opel, A.G. This predestined the subsidiary to become important to the Nazi war effort. In a heavily documented study presented to the Senate Subcommittee on Antitrust and Monopoly in February 1974, Bradford C. Snell, an assistant subcommittee counsel, wrote:

"'GM's participation in Germany's preparation for war began in 1935. That year its Opel subsidiary cooperated with the Reich in locating a new heavy truck facility at Brandenburg, which military officials advised would be less vulnerable to enemy air attacks. During the succeeding years, GM supplied the Wehrmact with Opel "Blitz" trucks from the Brandenburg complex./

STANDARD OIL OF NEW JERSEY (Now Exxon)
"On February 27, 1942," according to Higham, "Arnold, with documents stuffed under his arms, . . . strode into the lion's den of Standard at 30 Rockefeller Plaza. Just behind him were Secretary of the Navy Franklin Knox and Secretary of the Army Henry L. Stimson." They confronted Standard official William Farish and "Arnold sharply laid down his charges" that "by continuing to favor Hitler in rubber deal and patent arrangements," Standard Oil "had acted against the interests of the American government . . . suggested a fine of $1.5 million and a consent decree whereby Standard would turn over for the duration all the patents" in question.
"Farish rejected the proposal on the spot. He pointed out that Standard" was also selling the U.S. a "high percentage" of the fuel being used by the Army, Navy, and Air Force "making it possible for America to win the war. Where would America be without it?" Blackmail? Yes, says Higham. And effective. Arnold was finally reduced to asking the oil company official "to what Standard Oil would agree. After all, there had to be at least token punishment. . . . Arnold, Stimson, and Knox soon realized they had no power to compare with that of Standard."
The price Standard Oil "agreed" to pay for its crime? A modest fine of a few thousand dollars divided up among ten defendants. "Farish paid $1,000, or a quarter of one week's salary, for having betrayed America."

http://www.usembassy.org.uk/ukamb.html


October 2002

President Bush named William Farish of Texas as his nominee for Ambassador to the Court of St. James's in March 2001. The Senate confirmed his appointment in July 2001.


http://www.usembassy.org.uk/ukamb/farish15.html

“In the business world, where my background lies, just as in the government sphere I inhabit these days, the subject of ethics has been a major preoccupation in recent months. Indeed, the continuing revelations of abuses in corporate reporting and accounting have led some commentators to warn that our society is inexorably sliding down the slippery slope into moral ruin - if we're not there already.”


How sick is that? We’ve been there since he blackmailed the US Government in time of War..

He’s a friend of the Queen apparently, race horse breeder. BTW- the Queen was visibly shaken by the new bond film – Why? Whats it about? (I don’t get out the cave much in winter)

And who are the “Dark Forces that stalk this land”?

Anyway, Back to the Future!!!

http://www.ushmm.org/outreach/wgupris.htm

Many Jews in ghettos across eastern Europe tried to organize resistance against the Germans and to arm themselves with smuggled and homemade weapons/

In January 1943, Warsaw ghetto fighters fired upon German troops as they tried to round up another group of ghetto inhabitants for deportation. Fighters used a small supply of weapons that had been smuggled into the ghetto. After a few days, the troops retreated. This small victory inspired the ghetto fighters to prepare for future resistance./

The ghetto fighters were able to hold out for nearly a month, but on May 16, 1943, the revolt ended. The Germans had slowly crushed the resistance. Of the more than 56,000 Jews captured, about 7,000 were shot, and the remainder were deported to killing centers or concentration camps/

In German, Konzentrationslager. Prison camps constructed to hold Jews, Gypsies, political and religious opponents, resisters, homosexuals, and other Germans considered "enemies of the state." Before the end of World War II, more than 100 concentration camps had been created across German-occupied Europe.

Auschwitz-Birkenau
Largest Nazi camp, located 37 miles west of Cracow, Poland. Established in 1940 as a concentration camp, it included a killing center, at Birkenau, in 1942. Also part of the huge camp complex was I. G. Farben's slave labor camp, known as Buna-Monowitz.

http://www.edwardvictor.com/Holocaust/Auschwitz.htm

Beginning in 1941, the Buna Works were built in Monowitz for the manufacture of synthetic rubber. The Auschwitz III camp was assigned to IG Farben in May 1942 for use in connection with these chemical works./

http://fcit.coedu.usf.edu/Holocaust/timeline/ghettos.htm

Hitler incorporated the western part of Poland into Germany according to race doctrine. He intended that Poles were to become the slaves of Germany and that the two million Jews therein were to be concentrated in ghettos in Poland's larger cities. Later this would simplify transport to the death camps. Nazi occupation authorities officially told the story that Jews were natural carriers of all types of diseases, especially typhus, and that it was necessary to isolate Jews from the Polish community. Jewish neighborhoods thus were transformed into prisons. The five major ghettos were located in Warsaw , Lódz, Kraków, Lublin, and Lvov.

Where did Hitler get this idea of “Social and Industrial re-organisation”?

http://www.unclenicks.net/research/CIA-Gestapo/Elkhorn2/elkhorn2.html


"Ford's book 'The International Jew' was issued in 1927. A virulent anti-Semitic tract, it was still being distributed in Latin America and the Arab countries as late as 1945. Hitler admired the book and it influenced him deeply. Visitors to Hitler's headquarters at the Brown House in Munich noticed a large photograph of Henry Ford hanging in his office. Stacked high on the table outside were copies of Ford's book. As early as 1923," when Hitler heard that Ford was planning to run for President, he "told an interviewer from the 'Chicago-Tribune,' 'I wish that I could send some of my shock troops to Chicago and other big American cities to help'."

http://users.crocker.com/~acacia/text_bhfibh.html

Copyright, 1922. by The New York Times Company. Special Cable to THE NEW YORK TIMES

BERLIN, Dec. 10.—A rumor is current here, that Henry Ford, the American Automobile manufacturer, is financing Adolph Hitler's nationalist anti-Semitic movement in Munich. Indeed, the Berlin Tageblatt has made an appeal to the American Ambassador in Berlin to investigate and interfere.

Doubtless there is some ground for suspicion that Hitler is spending foreign money, for the paper marks his admirers throughout Germany contribute toward his movement would hardly suffice to pay for such large expenditure as his personal and business establishments require. His spacious headquarters in Munich are splendidly furnished and his organization employs a host of highly paid lieutenants and officials.

So in 1922 the free German Press was begging America, on behalf of the German people, to stop American Industrialists, in this case Ford, from supporting Hitler. Certainly puts “Collective Guilt” into perspective.

One should ask. Who’s Guilt?

http://www.unclenicks.net/canvas/Fourth_Reich/fourth_reich.html

On March 19, 1934, Prescott Bush (Grandfather of Dubya) then director of the German Steel Trust's Union Banking Corporation, initiated an alert to Averell Harriman about a problem which had developed in the Flick partnership.
Bush sent Harriman a clipping from the New York Times of that day, which reported that the Polish Government was fighting back against American and German stockholders who controlled Polands largest industrial unit, the Upper Silesian Coal and Steel Company.


Or. Where are they now?

23:43/24/11 Tbc

http://www.unclenicks.net
Webmaster@Unclenicks.net

(No replies)