Life | The Universe | Everything | Advanced Search

	Sign in or register to join or start a new conversation.

This is the Conversation Forum for Editorial Feedback << EF: Subbed Entries EF: Artwork >> Subject: EF: Historical Re-enactment Posted Jun 15, 2012 by U168592   Posting 1 Recently subbing an Entry, I linked to this Entry: A288533 However, quite embarassingly the word Napoleonic is misspelt not only in the Entry but also the external link! Civil War also needs capitalising (and maybe a link). There is some other minor punctuation that probably needs a look at, the Entry could do with some more h2g2 links added too, but on a whole it is quite a nicely written little piece (it might be something I may update in future, but I kind of linke it as it is). Matt Read the First Reply to this Posting Subject: EF: Historical Re-enactment Posted Jun 15, 2012 by Lanzababy - Guide Editor This is a reply to this Posting   Posting 2 sp fixed Link added This sentence is confusing. Any ideas what it actually means, or suggestions on how better to express it? >>>To become a fully kitted out Dragoon in an English Cavalry Regiment like the 15th (Kings) Light Dragoons (Hussars) can cost over £2,000 (GBP) is ""15th (Kings) Light Dragoons (Hussars)"" the correct/best way to write this regiment's name? Also, I can quite happily lose the (GBP) - it is superfluous. Read the First Reply to this Posting Subject: EF: Historical Re-enactment Posted Jun 15, 2012 by U168592 This is a reply to this Posting   Posting 3 Thanks During the Napoeonic era that was the correct way of writing the form, as the regiments often underwent changes when joining with other regiments and altering. They are now known as the 15th King's Hussars, but for the purposes of the Entry it should read: 15th (King's) Light Dragoons (Hussars. I know it looks clumsy, but that's correct. I would suggest ot should read: To become a fully kitted out Dragoon in an English Cavalry Regiment Re-enactment Group, like the 15th (Kings) Light Dragoons (Hussars), can cost over £2,000. Read the First Reply to this Posting Subject: EF: Historical Re-enactment Posted Jun 15, 2012 by Lanzababy - Guide Editor This is a reply to this Posting   Posting 4 Changes made. I like that Entry too. Rather than just update this one, perhaps a totally new one, focusing on a certain aspect of re-enactment might be possible? I've not got time, right now, to seek out any other links, but if you think of any you'd like adding, just drop a note here and I'll come back and add them later. Read the First Reply to this Posting Subject: EF: Historical Re-enactment Posted Jun 15, 2012 by U168592 This is a reply to this Posting   Posting 5 No problem. I have friends in the Sealed Knot, and may do an Entry about them. Read the First Reply to this Posting Subject: EF: Historical Re-enactment Posted Jun 15, 2012 by U168592 This is a reply to this Posting   Posting 6 Actually, for balance, a link to them in the text might be worthwhile: <LINK HREF="http://www.thesealedknot.org.uk/" TITLE="Sealed Knot">Sealed Knot</LINK> Read the First Reply to this Posting Subject: EF: Historical Re-enactment Posted Jun 15, 2012 by Lanzababy - Guide Editor This is a reply to this Posting   Posting 7 Done Thanks for all your help Matt, much appreciated. Read the First Reply to this Posting Subject: EF: Historical Re-enactment Posted Jun 15, 2012 by U168592 This is a reply to this Posting   Posting 8 Ta muchly. Not sure if it's help, or hindrance. But the Entry had a few threads off it, so was/is being read Conversation list Conversation list

Please note that Not Panicking Ltd is not responsible for the content of any external sites listed. The content on h2g2 is created by h2g2's Researchers, who are members of the public. Unlike Edited Guide Entries, the content on this page has not necessarily been checked by a h2g2 editor. In the event that you consider anything on this page to be in breach of the site's House Rules, please click here .

About | Help | Terms of Use