Front Page

Life | The Universe | Everything | Advanced Search
 
Front PageReadTalkContributeHelp!FeedbackWho is Online

or register to join or start a new conversation.

 
This is the Conversation Forum for Terms and Conditions
Thanks for the rules >>

Subject: Irelevant discussions
Posted Oct 26, 2011 by
Stephen Booth aka Buffy
 
Posting 1

Next Posting
I notice there doesn't seem to be any rules regarding irrelevant content in discussions on entries, other than when it is in flooding. By this I mean entries in the discussion of an entry which is not related or only very tenuously related to the entry. For example I found (after having been away from H2G2 for some years due to losing and not being able to retrieve my password) that on my entry giving fan mail addresses for for people on the Buffy and Angel shows some users had used the discussions to basically have a chat about how great it was to have had an IM chat the night before. It's not spam (as I understand the term), it's not vulgar/profane, it's not commercial promotion and it's not flooding, so there does not seem to be a house rule against it so I cannot use the 'Yikes!' button to ask for it to be removed. It is annoying. It is off topic. It is inappropriate (rather like being in a library trying to study whilst a group of people behind you are giggling and chatting about last weekends X-Factor).

Might I suggest a house rule along the lines of "Keep discussions relevant to the topic of the guide entry they are connected to. Do not use discussion for general chatter"?

Thanks

Stephen




Reply
Read the First Reply to this Posting

Click here to register a complaint about this Posting
Subject: Irelevant discussions
Posted Oct 26, 2011 by
Vip
This is a reply to this Posting  
Posting 2

Previous PostingNext Posting
*takes note*

This isn't something that we have included, you are right, as h2g2 threads have a long history of going off topic.

However, I can see your point when it comes to Entries as these tend to be about a specific topic.

It's not something we can discuss straight away but I wanted to let you know that this had been seen. ok

fairy

Reply
Click here to register a complaint about this Posting
Subject: Irelevant discussions
Posted Feb 21, 2012 by
shadowcat_2
This is a reply to this Posting  
Posting 3

Previous Posting
biggrin Well, I GUESS a version of thresholds need to be figured. What's the minimum % of relationship to the post's topic (or responses to). I'll agree tho, a BVS Post SHOULD have something on the titled character or the subsidiary ones, therein. cheerup tea

Reply
Click here to register a complaint about this Posting




Already at Start of ConversationNo Older Postings to ShowNo Newer Postings to ShowAlready at End of Conversation
Postings 1-20

Conversation list




Already at Start of ConversationNo Older Postings to ShowNo Newer Postings to ShowAlready at End of Conversation
Postings 1-20

Conversation list

Front PageReadTalkContributeHelp!FeedbackWho is Online

Please note that Not Panicking Ltd is not responsible for the content of any external sites listed. The content on h2g2 is created by h2g2's Researchers, who are members of the public. Unlike Edited Guide Entries, the content on this page has not necessarily been checked by a h2g2 editor. In the event that you consider anything on this page to be in breach of the site's House Rules, please click here .


About | Help | Terms of Use