 | | | Subject: 'Submit for review'
Posted May 9, 2004 by Traveller in Times >42 )^( _
This is a reply to this Posting
| | Posting
2
  | | Traveller in Time  viewing far
"And why should it not be suitable for any review forum? I do not mind for anybody to post their comments about it.
Taking the rules for potential edited entries it could be a candidate! It is a real life subject using factual data. Well perhaps there is a tiny bit of fantasy in the 'weather' and 'cloud' naming bit, any suggestions for better fitting words?
Well, admitted, I would not think of having this one edited, however you never know what happens.
Creating entries is a routine for me as well as checking the forum. It should be, as I have written enough of them to get the hang of it."
|
| | | Subject: 'Submit for review'
Posted May 9, 2004 by Traveller in Times >42 )^( _
This is a reply to this Posting
| | Posting
4
| | Traveller in Time on top
"Well, I may be lucky then  , none of my entries so far has been submitted by anyone  .
And I certainly disagree with most scouts on the matter: material for the Edited Guide.
For instance < A2161504 > the first message has all an entry should have.
The first part is brilliant, there is a perfect balance between
'We do not want your garbage here' and
'nice poetry, somebody will appreciate this'
As an entry it could be seen indexed under /communication /messages /rejections, just to give an example.
They have added the second message since the postings.
I think it is more negative  not the delicacy of the first one, however it does contain the usefull hint to re move the entry.
"
|
|
