Life | The Universe | Everything | Advanced Search

	Sign in or register to join or start a new conversation.

This is the Journal of anhaga << A uniquely Canadian comment on world events Multiculturalism >> Subject: hmm. 'no hard evidence . . .' Posted Jul 14, 2006 by anhaga   Posting 1 What to make of this? 'On June 5, 2006, the Muckraker Report contacted the FBI Headquarters, (202) 324-3000, to learn why Bin Laden’s Most Wanted poster did not indicate that Usama was also wanted in connection with 9/11. The Muckraker Report spoke with Rex Tomb, Chief of Investigative Publicity for the FBI. When asked why there is no mention of 9/11 on Bin Laden’s Most Wanted web page, Tomb said, "The reason why 9/11 is not mentioned on Usama Bin Laden’s Most Wanted page is because the FBI has no hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11." ' http://www.teamliberty.net/id267.html Read the First Reply to this Posting Subject: hmm. 'no hard evidence . . .' Posted Jul 14, 2006 by Mudhooks: ,,, busier than a one-legged man in an ass-kicking contest... This is a reply to this Posting   Posting 2 Curiouser and curiouser.... That is a few million miles from a cautious "allegedly involved" to cover their keesters if bin Laden were found "not guilty" (innocent until proven guilty). Conversation list Conversation list

Please note that Not Panicking Ltd is not responsible for the content of any external sites listed. The content on h2g2 is created by h2g2's Researchers, who are members of the public. Unlike Edited Guide Entries, the content on this page has not necessarily been checked by a h2g2 editor. In the event that you consider anything on this page to be in breach of the site's House Rules, please click here .

About | Help | Terms of Use